The Philosophical Basis of Racial Separation and the Means to Achieve it

Listen Siblings, I come in peace,

“Spiritual Capital is the means towards and ends of racial asili.”Philosopher-King Onitaset Kumat

We need a Philosophical Basis for Racial Separation; lest our struggle will be fruitless.  Study the following–it’s complicated but correct–it will give you more wisdom than the world has heretofore offered you.  Embrace it.  With this, all opposition or reluctance on your separation can and will be vanquished.  This is their very spirit.

In 2010, I published a book enumerating morality, immorality, amorality and irrationality as derived from “The Law of Morality:” Morality is the use of Military Capital against Immorality, the use of Military Capital in want of Civil Capital. Military Capital, generally defined as “the means towards and ends of thievery,” is limited to four types: Mobilization, Valuation, Ruination and Limitation. Civil Capitals are limited to seven: Intellectual Capital, Social Capital, Human Capital, Physical Capital, Sexual Capital, Cultural Capital, and Spiritual Capital. In 2010, “Spiritual Capital” was undefined. Only in 2012, after defining “race,” was “Spiritual Capital” defined; the Civil Capitals are the means towards and ends of self-determination, society, value, production, sex, identity, and racial asili, respectively. This begs to question, what is amorality and irrationality? Amorality is exchanges of Civil Capital for Civil Capital, as between those morally capable (simply, those capable of ‘theft.’) Irrationality is exchanges of Capital, as with one morally incapable. Spiritual Capital is the highest of the Civil Capitals and exchanges between it and another Civil Capital are the most complementary: This is Spiritual Amorality; the Ideal Amorality. Spiritual Capital is also the only Civil Capital that’s race-specific; otherwise morality, the aim, in challenging immorality, toward the balance of amorality, is universal.

In examining the Spiritual Capital of Europeans: Tribalism; and Asians: Contractualism, the Philosophical Basis of Racial Separation is established.  Subscribe, share, love.

The Philosophical Basis of Racial Separation and the Means to Achieve it
By Philosopher-King Onitaset Kumat

In the above exposition it is stated “Spiritual Capital is the highest of the Civil Capitals and exchanges between it and another Civil Capital are the most complementary.”

As Spiritual Capital is “the means towards and ends of racial asili (or ideology,)” it’s upon us to explore what the racial asili of European and Asian people are. A quick reference to the page on Occidentals and Orientals shows how Tribalism and Contractualism are the European and Asian racial asili respectively. In the finest detail, both derive from the historical beginnings of these people. For our purposes, Tribalism is a will toward Tribal Empowerment and Contractualism is a will toward Contractual Obedience. A former instance is so-called “White Supremacy,” the derivative of establishing first a White tribe then empowering that said tribe. A latter instance is the so-called legal and religious systems, the derivative of establishing first a doctrine then enforcing it as itself an authority.

To establish the Philosophical Basis of Racial Separation, we need to look upon the desirable Spiritual Amorality (Civil Capital exchanged for Spiritual Capital) for Europeans and Asians closely. Generally, Spiritual Amorality resembles exchanges toward, for Europeans, the empowerment of a tribe; for Asians, the obedience of a contract.

Repeated, the seven Civil Capitals are Intellectual Capital, Social Capital, Human Capital, Physical Capital, Sexual Capital, Cultural Capital, and Spiritual Capital.

For language purposes, the “ideal Civil Amorality” is the Civil Capital exchanged for Spiritual Capital.

Therefore, the ideal Intellectual Amorality, for Europeans, is Intellectual Capital exchanged for Spiritual Capital: When the European in question’s self-determination (moral capacity) is directed toward the empowerment of a European tribe. For instance, tribalizing African people for the benefit of Europeans. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Intellectual Amorality, for Asians, is Intellectual Capital exchanged for Spiritual Capital: When the Asian in question’s self-determination (moral capacity) is directed toward the obedience of a contract. For instance, contractualizing African people against their interests. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Social Amorality, for Europeans, is when the European in question’s society is directed toward the empowerment of a European tribe. For instance, discriminating against African people for European benefit. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Social Amorality, for Asians, is when the Asian in question’s society is directed toward the obedience of a contract. For instance, binding Africans in caste or class systems. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Human Amorality, for Europeans, is when the European in question’s value is directed toward the empowerment of a European tribe. For instance, enslaving Africans for European benefit. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Human Amorality, for Asians, is when the Asian in question’s value is directed toward the obedience of a contract. For instance, limiting the usefulness of Africans to Africa. directing one’s resourcefulness strictly to Africans. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Physical Amorality, for Europeans, is when the European in question’s production is directed toward the empowerment of a European tribe. For instance, stealing African resources for European benefit. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Physical Amorality, for Asians, is when the Asian in question’s production is directed toward the obedience of a contract. For instance, limiting the usefulness of Africa to Africans. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Sexual Amorality, for Europeans, is when the European in question’s sex is directed toward the empowerment of a European tribe. For instance, castrating Africans for European benefit. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Sexual Amorality, for Asians, is when the Asian in question’s sex is directed toward the obedience of a contract. For instance, raping Africans by the book. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Cultural Amorality, for Europeans, is when the European in question’s identity is directed toward the empowerment of a European tribe. For instance, dehumanizing Africans for European benefit. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

The ideal Cultural Amorality, for Asians, is when the Asian in question’s identity is directed toward the obedience of a contract. For instance, propagating Africans as un-chosen. Ergo, their utmost spiritual ideal is a normal detriment to our people.

Therefore Spiritual Immorality and Spiritual Morality have a plethora of meanings. Two representative meanings applied to European or Asian people are Spiritual Immorality as an imbalancing force, involving the valuation of Tribalism or Contractualism, European and Asian asili, respectively, below Restorism, African asili; and Spiritual Morality, as a balancing force, involving the valuation of Restorism below Tribalism and Contractualism for Africans. In other words, a moral European or Asian can not be concerned with restoring Africa or African people.

In this the African Blood Siblings (ABS) is the only organization that provides the means toward Racial Separation seeing how Racial Separation entails European Tribalism and Asian Contractualism through the Ethical Standard only the ABS in the person of Onitaset Kumat has defined. Not only is the ABS the only organization with the necessary consciousness, the ABS is the only organization promoting that consciousness.

People like you have stood up to create African Blood Siblings Community Centers (ABSCC) where they are. These centers offer a range of consciousness development spanning the four sciences of liberation: Philosophy, Sociology, Ecology, and Psychology. Philosophy generally covers the Capitals as outlined here; particularly Morality and Ideal Amorality. Sociology goes into depth with the Intellectual and Social Capitals; Ecology, Human and Physical Capitals; Psychology, Sexual and Cultural Capitals. This consciousness development aims to make African people moral and complete; independent and interdepedent; resourceful and ‘resourced;’ salacious and sagacious.  It also aims to teach the immorality for Originals of other races: Their will to keep us dependent, impoverished and corrupted.

These African Blood Siblings Community Centers will solve the problems we have and create an international network of Prosperous, Independent African Communities.

This is known from conversations with the ancestors:

“The key to all problems is the problem of consciousness.”

When you apply to the African Blood Siblings (ABS) to establish an African Blood Siblings Community Center (ABSCC) where you are, you apply to restore the consciousness of our people and enable us to achieve Prosperous, Independent African Communities where you are.

Rise up you nobility! You have the Philosophical Basis of Racial Separation! Assert the means to achieve it! Build! Build! Build an ABSCC where you are!

Let our ancestor Garvey finish it:

“Up you mighty race!
You can accomplish what you will!”

Embrace it.  With this, all opposition or reluctance on your liberation can and will be vanquished.  This is your very spirit.

6 thoughts on “The Philosophical Basis of Racial Separation and the Means to Achieve it

    1. I wrote a post on Neo-Nazi Trainers. It’s scheduled for the 11th. The Occidental is remarkably tribal. They will assault and attack other White people who don’t belong to their tribes. It’s what they have been doing for millenniums. This is partly why White people can not understand the Black struggle. It’s their nature that we’re reacting to; but we don’t realize it.
      Some Occidentals request the complete separation of races, but they mean the complete separation of tribes and then the complete domination of tribes. What’s important to know is that they too are dissatisfied with their governments. Mostly because they are not as dominant. The Occidental seems pretty bent on destroying the whole planet
      The surest way to resist this is to separate from them and let them destroy themselves.
      One of our problems is how we continually integrate with them or teach them how to be more tolerable.
      This comes back to bite us.
      Thanks for commenting,

    2. sadly I just listened to another COWS interview and heard a similar thing. It really shatters the self, for we tend to grow up dreaming that we all share some universal human, common-goal, and yet, even if this is true, its real implications – in terms of the disempowered “originals” – are disturbing. The common goal is liberation, and yet, for one, this liberation means oppression. (just take a guess)

  1. [One of our problems is how we continually integrate with them or teach them how to be more tolerable. This comes back to bite us.]

    YES! THIS!

    I recently just personally experienced this.

    I don’t feel like it’s my job to educate an Occidental on what is and isn’t racist.

    They try to make it seem like they’re being sensitive, or “anti-racist” when in reality – they’re just learning how to HIDE their racism.

    I had to learn this the hard way – and I’m glad I did. I would rather live in the truth!

    I am not able to physically segregate myself yet, but I have mentally and emotionally.

    1. The reality with Occidentals is they have always been tribalistic. In your other comments you pointed out how a “White” in America would possibly have separate nationalities: https://africanbloodsiblings.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/multi-racial-pride/#comment-4281

      These Whites invariably identify themselves by the diversity or non-diversity of their nationalities, never “European” but “Quarter-Irish, Quarter-Italian, and half-German.” To the European pedigree is of the utmost because tribes are of the utmost. When Europeans are WASPs (White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestants), matching one another in complexion, in lineage, in religion, they then compare states and cities and if that’s not a reason to compete they may compare whose family was earlier in America (“first family of Virginia” or “women of the mayflower” for instance.) The European is by nature tribalistic, much like hyenas though the European is Patriarchal. What we Africans call Racism is actually European tribalism. What’s more, attempting to correct European racism (tribalism) is as fruitless as attempting to reform hyenas into Lion society. We don’t yet see this.

      On word usage, we should not use the word “Segregate” but “Separate.” Segregation differs from Integration, true, but it’s not Separation. Segregation is when Africans will receive separate accommodations; Separation is when Africans develop separate accommodations. Segregation is still dependency and in many ways it’s worse than Integration. Ghettos are “Segregation.”

      Here’s an image of the Ghetto: https://africanbloodsiblings.wordpress.com/2013/02/27/how-bigger-was-born-by-richard-wright/

      Or: https://africanbloodsiblings.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/this-is-america-the-dependent-african-change/

      With regard ability to physically separate, it’s in micro-organization. The African Blood Siblings micro-organizes local units of Organization which undertake the creation of Prosperous, Independent African Communities. I realize I don’t have a great description of this, so I’ll get to working on that, but here’s a post showcasing why:

      https://africanbloodsiblings.wordpress.com/2012/08/21/letter-from-kuraja-why-create-communities/

      Certainly help encourage other readers.

      And keep writing. You are very appreciated. :)

Please ask any questions that come to mind

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s