Critique of Race Traitor’s “Abolish the White Race”

Listen Siblings, I come in peace,

“The problem with Europeans and Asians is Europeans and Asians; the solution for Africans is Africans!” — Onitaset Kumat

Below we study the so-called liberated European.  It’s senseless.  By merit of Philosophy we should separate from European people.  Our people need to learn this.  Write to help build African Blood Siblings Community Centers.  Subscribe, share, love.

Critique of Race Traitor’s “Abolish the White Race”
By Onitaset Kumat

As promised a commenter, I will write a critique on a “well-meaning” Occidentals’ writing. In this critique, I will show how these soi-disant (self-described) “Race Traitors” are actually practitioners of Occidentalism (the ways of European people) and thus are White Supremacists. I will reveal these traits: Grandiosity, Self-Importance, Ignorance of History, Short-Sightedness, and Sexual Aggression (among others). These are traits of European people. I show them to you, my African Blood Siblings, to show how no European is your ally in liberation, and our best hope is organizing as outlined by the African Blood Siblings. With luck, you will never take another European seriously when it comes to your liberation.

So with no further ado, the essay and the deserving criticism:

RACE TRAITOR, treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity

Abolish the White Race – By Any Means Necessary

Clearly, judging by the context, a mockery of our ancestor Malcolm X.

The white race is a historically constructed social formation – historically constructed because (like royalty) it is a product of some people’s responses to historical circumstances; a social formation because it is a fact of society corresponding to no classification recognized by natural science.

The nature of Occidentals (Europeans) is so grounded that any artifact of theirs exposes their flaws. Herein we see two very readily: the belittling of royalty and the appraisal of his ‘science.’ African Blood Siblings, the first ‘royals’ of history were African. And the first scientists of history were African. But our science wasn’t atheistic like the Occidentals’. As you know God empowered us with an ability to see the divine[1] and God has made Occidentals and Originals visually different[2]. Therefore there’s more than meets the eye. Nevertheless, the Occidental wills to tell you that his atheistic science is the only science, ignoring that the Ancient priests of Kemet, who were incredibly scientific, and whom originated their societies, claimed the existence of races[3].

The white race cuts across ethnic and class lines. It is not coextensive with that portion of the population of European descent, since many of those classified as “colored” can trace some of their ancestry to Europe, while African, Asian, or American Indian blood flows through the veins of many considered white. Nor does membership in the white race imply wealth, since there are plenty of poor whites, as well as some people of wealth and comfort who are not white.

This is another nature of the Occidental: They are short-sighted. The pure European exists in antiquity but the rapes and colonizations practiced especially by the male European has “colored” him and “whitened” others. Though, it’s here worth noting that phrases like “People of Color” confuse: Not only are there only three races, “Original,” “Occidental” and “Oriental,” corresponding to Africans, Europeans and Asians, corresponding to the “colors”, “Black,” “White” and “Yellow,” but if you use “Science” you’ll know that “Black” is not a color, though “White” is. “Color” corresponds with light, but “Black,” like the night, or deep space, is the absence of light. Hence “People of Color” would be non-Africans, not non-Europeans. More, non-Europeans are not allies, Asians have devastated Africans even before modern Europeans came onto the scene.

As to “poor Whites,” that should be a non-issue to Africans. This is a European economy which is designed to have poor and rich. That’s not an African problem. The African problem is that Africans are in this European economy.[4]

The white race consists of those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to the system that degrades them.

This again is short-sightedness on the part of the Occidental. Occidentals typically aren’t well-versed in history or global politics, hence they can not connect the dots as to what’s really going on in the global economy. Nevertheless, it can be clearly stated that the past effects the present, thus every European benefits and every African suffers from the global culture regardless of nominal support from Europeans.

The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign.

Again, short-sightenedness and also grandiose self-importance. An Original (African) may read this Occidental and smile, but we must contend that our liberation will not depend on the whims of Occidentals. Our liberation deals with the Trinity of Liberation[5] and our racial uplift through organization, particularly the African Blood Siblings. But mainly it’s important to realize that “Culture” exists and Occidental and Original culture are fundamentally different.[6][7]

Advocating the abolition of the white race is distinct from what is called “anti-racism.” The term “racism” has come to be applied to a variety of attitudes, some of which are mutually incompatible, and has been devalued to mean little more than a tendency to dislike some people for the color of their skin. Moreover, anti-racism admits the natural existence of “races” even while opposing social distinctions among them. The abolitionists maintain, on the contrary, that people were not favored socially because they were white; rather they were defined as “white” because they were favored. Race itself is a product of social discrimination; so long as the white race exists, all movements against racism are doomed to fail.

Again grandiose self-importance. First, note the mockery of “abolitionism.” Suddenly, these are our new “Abolitionists.” Secondly, note the dismissal of anti-racists, a result of African scholarship. Disclaimer: Some may reason, isn’t “Trinity of Liberation” self-important? My answer, you have to read it. Does it boldly and blindly claim a dismissal of other ideas? No. These people claim there’s no natural existence of ‘races’ as if you were blind, or deaf, or dumb. It’s no myth that Africans and Europeans are different according to every use of one’s senses, even touch! Yet these Occidentals, always lying, want to tell you to your face “race” doesn’t exist? For what? For your Original Woman.

Come on! People were “White” before they came to America. In the so-called Middle Ages, everyone knew “Whites.” But they were not “favored.” They were “Whites.” Again, little knowledge of history.

The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender or any other interests they hold. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a determinant of behavior will set off tremors that will lead to its collapse.

This is the other nature of Occidentals, sexually lusting after Originals. How many of the writers and readers for this garbage do you believe openly pursue interracial relationships? This is their crutch. It’s a great misfortune that, as we are educated by Occidentals, we sometimes think as they do, and this seems ‘scholarly’ and ‘liberating’ though it’s sophomoric and enslaving. Truly the complexion of Occidentals is a huge determinant of Occidental behaviorisms. In fact, Occidentals themselves call their unique behaviors “Occidentalism.” They want to convince you otherwise, but haven’t I shown you that they are grandiose, self-important, individualists, dismissing of our royalty and sciences, and sexually lusting after you? Do not forget, too, that they are genocidal. This last trait, though not showing itself here, is so distinctly Occidental that to forget it is a danger onto us. How many times have they killed our populations off? How many Originals were taken to Europe but have no descendants there today? How many of the Herero were slaughtered? How many died in our MAAFA? Come now! These are a genocidal people. They want you to think that behavior is not determined by race, so as to convince you sexually. There, they wish to limit your reproduction, as a form of genocide.[8] That’s only the tip of how deeply hateful they are!

RACE TRAITOR aims to serve as an intellectual center for those seeking to abolish the white race. It will encourage dissent from the conformity that maintains it and popularize examples of defection from its ranks, analyze the forces that hold it together and those which promise to tear it apart. Part of its task will be to promote debate among abolitionists. When possible, it will support practical measures, guided by the principle, Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity. Dissolve the club

This is another appeal toward interracialism. For instance, “Culture” is the continuity from ancestry to descendents. So a “Culture” needs to have an ancestry. Which ancestry do these people adopt? The Occidentals. Therefore, in an Original union with these Occidentals, what happens? The Original subscribes to Occidentalism wherein the Occidental sexually preys upon the Original making a “human race” that’s not Original: The genocide of the Original.

The white race is a club, which enrolls certain people at birth, without their consent, and brings them up according to its rules. For the most part the members go through life accepting the benefits of membership, without thinking about the costs. When individuals question the rules, the officers are quick to remind them of all they owe to the club, and warn them of the dangers they will face if they leave it.

An analogy which relies upon ignorance of history (also, another trait of Occidentals: they are always innocent.) As Originals, we need to realize that the problem isn’t with Occidentals teaching Occidentals to hate Originals. The problem is in Occidentals teaching Originals to hate Originals. What does this essay do? It doesn’t address the problem. It makes up a problem. Who should teach the Occidental besides the Occidental? No one[9]. But who should teach the Original? This essay espouses the “Occidental.” Look at the language: “Certain people at birth,” “Accepting the benefits of membership,” “individuals,” “officers,” “dangers [. . .] if they leave.” There are supposed “officers” whom have the “acceptable” social responsibility of conferring advantages to White individuals and thus disadvantages to Black individuals. These “Race Traitors” take issue with these officers keeping them privileged, not with the power of these (obviously White) Officers over Black individuals. Get what’s being covered? The Occidental is innocent of his privileges because senior members of his club ‘warn’ him that the club is necessary. What nonsense!

RACE TRAITOR aims to dissolve the club, to break it apart, to explode it. Some people who sympathize with our aim have asked us how we intend to win over the majority of so-called whites to anti-racism. Others, usually less friendly, have asked if we plan to exterminate physically millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of people. Neither of these plans is what we have in mind. The weak point of the club is its need for unanimity. Just as the South, on launching the Civil War, declared that it needed its entire territory and would have it, the white race must have the support of all those it has designated as its constituency, or it ceases to exist.

As predicted, the Occidental would speak about genocide. Yes, I did read this essay before, but I forgot this passage when I typed above about the Occidental’s trait for Genocide. Anyway, there you have it. This point on “need for unanimity” is wishful thinking. This article is nearly 10 years old. Clearly the concept of “White race” still exists.

Elsewhere in this number, readers will find an account of John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry and some of the events it set in motion. Before the Civil War, the leading spokesmen for the slaveholders acknowledged that the majority of white northerners, swayed above all by the presence of the fugitive slave, considered slavery unjust. The Southerners also understood that the opposition was ineffective; however much the white people of the north disapproved of the slave system, the majority went along with it rather than risk the ordinary comforts of their lives, meager as they were in many cases.

“Innocent Occidentals” preying sexually after Originals. You can smell it. Then of course the grandiose self-importance of an Occidental. A band of Europeans and Africans rebel against slavery. In one instance of more than two-hundred, a well-armed European leads, so he becomes an immortal. What about Nat Turner[10] or the other two-hundred-plus?

When John Brown attacked Harpers Ferry, Southern pro- slavery leaders reacted with fury: they imposed a boycott on northern manufactures, demanded new concessions from the government in Washington, and began to prepare for war. When they sought to portray John Brown as a representative of northern opinion, Southern leaders were wrong; he represented only a small and isolated minority. But they were also right, for he expressed the hopes that still persisted in the northern population despite decades of cringing before the slaveholders. Virginia did not fear John Brown and his small band of followers, but his soul that would go marching on, though his body lay a-mould’rin’ in the grave.

That last line is a reference to “John Brown’s Body.” Besides that, this paragraph is useless. “Small and isolated” minority is an understatement.

When the South, in retaliation for Harpers Ferry, sought to further bully northern opinion, it did so not out of paranoia but out of the realistic assessment that only a renewal of the national pro-slavery vows could save a system whose proud facade concealed a fragile foundation. By the arrogance of their demands, the Southern leaders compelled the people of the north to resist. Not ideas but events were in command. Each step led inexorably to the next: Southern land-greed, Lincoln’s victory, secession, war, blacks as laborers, soldiers, citizens, voters. And so the war that began with not one person in a hundred foreseeing the end of slavery was transformed within two years into an anti-slavery war.

Again, this is the all-important Europeans and the widespread ignorance of history. It’s so linear and one-dimensional that to address it would more waste our time. The European is sufficiently exposed.

It is our faith – and with those who do not share it we shall not argue – that the majority of so-called whites in this country are neither deeply nor consciously committed to white supremacy; like most human beings in most times and places, they would do the right thing if it were convenient. As did their counterparts before the Civil War, most go along with a system that disturbs them, because the consequences of challenging it are terrifying. They close their eyes to what is happening around them, because it is easier not to know.

This is another fact of Occidentals, their lives are ruled by hate and fear.[7][12] However, it’s worth noting that these Occidentals are wrong when they say that Whites are not deeply nor consicously committed to White Supremacy. It’s a ridiculous display of ignorance. It’s not too ironic that this paragraph ends describing the writers whom “close their eyes to what is happening around them, because it is easier not to know.”

At rare moments their nervous peace is shattered, their certainty is shaken, and they are compelled to question the common sense by which they normally live. One such moment was in the days immediately following the Rodney King verdict, when a majority of white Americans were willing to admit to polltakers that black people had good reasons to rebel, and some joined them. Ordinarily the moments are brief, as the guns and reform programs are moved up to restore order and, more important, the confidence that matters are in good hands and they can go back to sleep. Both the guns and the reform programs are aimed at whites as well as blacks – the guns as a warning and the reform programs as a salve to their consciences.

Rodney King was an African man badly, badly beaten who following the beating asked “Can’t we all just get along?” This is Occidentalism. What should have been mentioned in the previous paragraph is the influence of Originalism on the Occidental. So to speak, our Philosophies can come through the mouths of Occidentals, hence Occidentals can nominally support Originals, yet concerning our nature, we are Philosophically different. Hence, this Occidental overlooked the influence of Originals on Occidental opinions, though the proof is here in the writings. It’s after Rodney King’s verdict when Whites admit this or that. AFTER is an important word.

Recently, one of our editors, unfamiliar with New York City traffic laws, made an illegal right turn there on a red light. He was stopped by two cops in a patrol car. After examining his license, they released him with a courteous admonition. Had he been black, they probably would have ticketed him, and might even have taken him down to the station. A lot of history was embodied in that small exchange: the cops treated the miscreant leniently at least in part because they assumed, looking at him, that he was white and therefore loyal. Their courtesy was a habit meant both to reward good conduct and induce future cooperation.

Again, notice how there is nothing wrong with an Occidental officer stopping an Original driver. The wrong is in the Occidental officer treating the Original and Occidental driver differently. Do you see the “White Supremacy” veiled in this supposed anti-White Supremacist paper? Isn’t the Occidental the officer and thus in the supreme position [to take one down to a station]?

Had the driver cursed them, or displayed a bumper sticker that said, “Avenge Rodney King,” the cops might have reacted differently. We admit that neither gesture on the part of a single individual would in all likelihood be of much consequence. But if enough of those who looked white broke the rules of the club to make the cops doubt their ability to recognize a white person merely by looking at him or her, how would it affect the cops’ behavior? And if the police, the courts, and the authorities in general were to start spreading around indiscriminately the treatment they normally reserve for people of color, how would the rest of the so-called whites react?

Again, there’s no issue here with officers being Occidental, for the laws following Occidentalism, or for the courts and authorities being Occidental, the issue is in the difference of treatment afforded the two groups from the power that is the Occidental himself.

Truly, Occidentals do treat Occidentals like they do Originals, but they do this in Europe. How do the Occidentals of Europe react? Just the same as they do in America. They do nothing. This is their nature. The mighty just people are the Originals–us.

How many dissident so-called whites would it take to unsettle the nerves of the white executive board? It is impossible to know. One John Brown – against a background of slave resistance – was enough for Virginia. Yet it was not the abolitionists, not even the transcendent John Brown, who brought about the mass shifts in consciousness of the Civil War period. At most, their heroic deeds were part of a chain of events that involved mutual actions and reactions on a scale beyond anything they could have anticipated – until a war that began with both sides fighting for slavery (the South to take it out of the Union, the north to keep it in) ended with a great army marching through the land singing, “As He died to make men holy, let us fight to make men free.”

Again, with hindsight we see that entertaining this conjecture is worth nothing. This was near ten-years ago and nothing came from it.

The moments when the routine assumptions of race break down are the seismic promise that somewhere in the tectonic flow a new fault is building up pressure, a new Harpers Ferry is being prepared. Its nature and timing cannot be predicted, but of its coming we have no doubt. When it comes, it will set off a series of tremors that will lead to the disintegration of the white race. We want to be ready, walking in Jerusalem just like John. What kind of journal is this?

Bore. By the way, this should show you the other flaw of Occidentals: Verbosity! We got the point long ago. This is also more grandiose which hindsight shows is wasteful.

RACE TRAITOR exists, not to make converts, but to reach out to those who are dissatisfied with the terms of membership in the white club. Its primary intended audience will be those people commonly called whites who, in one way or another, understand whiteness to be a problem that perpetuates injustice and prevents even the well-disposed among them from joining unequivocally in the struggle for human freedom. By engaging these dissidents in a journey of discovery into whiteness and its discontents, we hope to take part, together with others, in the process of defining a new human community. We wish neither to minimize the complicity of even the most downtrodden of whites with the system of white supremacy nor to exaggerate the significance of momentary departures from white rules.

Again. This is just Occidental sexual aggression. It’s very hidden, but look: “Joining unequivocally in the struggle for human freedom.” They want to join with us–with a singular motivation. It’s sickening.

We should say that there are some articles we are not interested in publishing. Since we are not seeking converts, we probably will not publish articles which lecture various organizations about their racial opportunism. Also we probably will not publish articles promoting inter-racial harmony, because that approach too often leaves intact differential treatment of whites and blacks and provides subtle confirmation of the idea that different races exist independently of social distinctions.

The “sexual aggression” exposed. They are against ‘inter-racial harmony’ explictly, but isn’t it implicit? Enough said.

In the original film version of ROBIN HOOD (starring Errol Flynn), the Sheriff of Nottingham says to Robin, “You speak treason.” Robin replies, “Fluently.” We hope to do the same.

From Race Traitor no. 1 (Winter 1993)

Notice. They speak “Treason” yet they show themselves to be steeped in Occidentalism. A “treasonous” Occidental would follow Originalism not Occidentalism. Originalism elevates one God, promotes African Sisterhoods and Brotherhoods, and recognizes the spiritual world. Nowhere in this article do we see any of these three aspects of Originalism. There’s some Originalism, naturally, but fundamentally this is an Occidentalist and “White Supremacist” paper. I hope that my handling of it was satisfactory to you.

Your Brother,
Subscribe to African Blood Siblings,

Footnotes:
[1] Kmt Self-knowledge and Cosmic wisdom [quotations] Ancient Wisdom
[2] Dialogue One of Five on Race: Culture Defined“Culture” Defined
[3] Halasiou
[4] The Allegory of the Kidnapped YouthTrue Issue
[5] Join: The Trinity of LiberationLiberation Theory
[6] Diop’s Two Cradle TheorySouthern/Northern Cradle
[7] Africans Should Love Everyone Love Everyone
[8] Integration: The Illusion of InclusionGenocidal Integration
[9] The Allegory of the Pitied ChildMoorish Lesson
[10] The Allegory of Nat TurnerAfrican Revolt
[11] Fable: The God-fearing HunterOccidental Theology

The Source for the Critiqued Essay is http://racetraitor.org/abolish.html

10 thoughts on “Critique of Race Traitor’s “Abolish the White Race”

  1. omalone1

    thank you for this resource as Mr Ignatiev tends to get credit just for mere words, rather than putting a knife to his throat and encouraging others to follow him. oops… did I write that. Must be the Bailey’s

    if anything I will note that I appreciated his sentiment about success being defined by white enemies as opposed to black friends, but again, SO WHAT.

    Reply
    1. Onitaset Post author

      A fellow African was peddling and promoting this author. I wrote the rebuttal for him.

      “Action” is the key word with regard ideas; “Restore,” Africans. In no way do European authors facilitate “restoration” and thus in no way are European authors relevant to the African struggle.

      Reply
      1. African

        You’re confused. I’m an African and doubt that you are one. How can you criticize a group of Europeans who sacrifice so much to liberate Africans from being called black people? Haven’t you read about the invention of the white race? How many people have you seen across the world whose ‘colors’ are black and white? What happened to the Yellow race and the Red race?

      2. Onitaset Post author

        Royal Sibling,

        “There has never been a white historian who ever wrote with any true love or feeling for the Negro.”

        For our Wisdom, you must use our Knowledge. For our Error, you must use our Ignorance. I will show you the Error of your writings by exposing to you the Ignorance Europeans gave you.

        1) How can you criticize a group of Europeans who sacrifice so much to liberate Africans from being called black people?

        You say that African people need to be liberated from being called Black. Liberation isn’t a question of name-calling but Power. A Race is no more Powerful if it’s called “Black,” “African,” “Negro,” “Nehesu,” “Halasiou,” “Nigger,” “Niger,” “Afro,” “American.” You called me confused because according to you I criticized Europeans who sacrificed for our Liberation. But in no way are these Europeans developing African Power. On the other hand, by promoting African Nationalism, I am. In essence, you attacked one engaged in your Liberation for one engaged in your Enslavement. As the Ancient Proverb goes, ” If the Master teaches what is error, the disciple’s submission is slavery; if he teaches truth, this submission is ennoblement.”

        2) Haven’t you read about the invention of the white race?

        Yes. Though it depends on which you mean. If you mean that “White” isn’t really a Race, then I’ve read about it. However, it’s not true. Look at this Ancient Picture from Ancient KMT (Egypt.)

        Ancient Depiction of Race

        http://onitaset.tumblr.com/post/54433705003

        If Race were not real, or if Europeans invented Race, why did our Ancestors in Ancient KMT write about different races of men and draw depictions that are parallel to this day and age’s? To wit, in the image above, the “Egyptian” is to the far left, and the African is the third depicted. The image is saying there are three different sorts of Men (hence the first image) of which the Egyptian belongs to the African race.

        You can read Khety III speaking to his son about Asiatics:

        https://africanbloodsiblings.wordpress.com/2013/05/24/the-instruction-of-merikare/

        Speak thus concerning the barbarian: As for the wretched Asiatic, unpleasant is the place where he is (with) trouble from water, difficulty from many trees, and the roads thereof awkward by reason of mountains. He does not dwell in one place, being driven hither and yon through want, going about [the desert] on foot. He has been fighting since the time of Horus; he never conquers, yet he is not conquered, and he does not announce a day of fighting, like a thief whom a community has driven out.

        3) How many people have you seen across the world whose ‘colors’ are black and white?

        In this language, capitalizing “Black” and “White” have a different connotation than “black” and “white.” Truly, I call us “Africans” or “Originals.” However, the point that we are not exactly black or they are not exactly white relates more to language customs than anything. I call Europeans “Whites;” not “white-skinned people.” “Whites” is a synecdoche for person of considerable European descent.

        4) What happened to the Yellow race and the Red race?

        Genocide. Provoked by either themselves or Europeans. The reality is that Africans exist in this condition of Genocide too. So what do we do next? The Herero were slaughtered; the Somali are starving; the children are dying in mines in the Congo; what do you feel you should do? Should you be writing the person calling attention to this “confused?” Should you be playing with semantics of your own imagination? Should you be trolling the internet while yours are being brutalized, exploited and mislead? Or should you be an adult and stand against your true foes?

        You must consider Power. And how no European will give you Power. The Europeans you defend are the one’s distracting you from Power. Do you want to be brutalized, exploited and mislead or do you want Power? If the latter, show some respect.

    1. Onitaset Post author

      Falsehoods are hard to sustain. This is the hope for our race, save that so unaware of the truth we fall for a new falsehood almost overnight.

      Regardless, the question becomes what are we up to? The ABS is organizing but beyond the ABS–what are we up to right now?

      Reply
  2. truthbetold

    This post is probably one of your best. I’ll reuse some of the material if it’s ok with you? Onitaset, our spirit is different from the European. Have you ever read Bobby Wright’s Book, The psychopathic Racial personality?

    It may answer some questions. I read it and it blew my mind.

    Reply
    1. Onitaset Post author

      I only wrote this because a frequenter of BrothaWolf and yours was peddling it. It made no sense to me why an African would peddle such an Occidental doctrine so I undertook to expose it on that peddler’s behalf.

      To me, it gives too much press to Occidentals. And this one hasn’t a shred of wit within.

      Reply
  3. the blackman

    and the articulation capacity can kill with a sound a vibration focused by the will conciously transfered to consciousness universely eqals powerful results AL MUHASIBY

    Reply

Please ask any questions that come to mind

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s