Tag Archives: Egypt

Nine of the Ten Commandments are Asian Errors

Listen Siblings, I come in peace,

“If the Master teaches what is error, the disciple’s submission is slavery; if he teaches truth, this submission is ennoblement.” — African Proverb (Ancient KMT)

Back in Ancient Africa, many scholastic Africans had heard of “Moses.” In Egypt, “Moses” meant “saved by water” and signified a baptized applicant to the schools. Recognizing how the Biblical Moses, learned in Africa, introduces baptism, circumcision and Ten Commandments (among other things) to an Asian people; and realizing that according to Censuses around 85% (or 34,000,000) of Africans in America are Christian and around 85% (or 850,000,000) of People in Africa are either Christian or Muslim (45% and 40% respectively); a study of the Ten Commandments and their errors can teach us of where we were, where we are and where we need to go: how we were corrupted and how we can repurify ourselves.

To understand how we were corrupted or to what we need to repurify, we need to know that Moses is actually a person of interest. In 1954, George G. M. James published “Stolen Legacy,” and mysteriously disappeared afterward. The work, one of my favorites, is a precise thesis on the African Origin of European Philosophy. On Moses, George G. M. James wrote:

We are told not only by the bible, but also by the historian Philo, that Moses was an Initiate of the Egyptian Mysteries and became a Hierogrammat; learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptian people. This was only possible by proper initiation and gradual advancement, when evidence of fitness was demonstrated by the Neophyte. The Egyptian name of Moses was given to all candidates at their baptism, and meant “saved by water”.

These are three separate sources–the Bible, Philo and George G. M. James–putting Moses as an interest for learning about Africa. The Father of European History also verifies this view in Volume 1 of “The History of Herodotus”:

For the people of Colchis are evidently Egyptian, and this I perceived for myself before I heard it from others. So when I had come to consider the matter I asked them both; and the Colchians had remembrance of the Egyptians more than the Egyptians of the Colchians; but the Egyptians said they believed that the Colchians were a portion of the army of Sesostris. That this was so I conjectured myself not only because they are dark-skinned and have curly hair (this of itself amounts to nothing, for there are other races which are so), but also still more because the Colchians, Egyptians, and Ethiopians alone of all the races of men have practised circumcision from the first. The Phenicians and the Syrians who dwell in Palestine confess themselves that they have learnt it from the Egyptians, and the Syrians about the river Thermodon and the river Parthenios, and the Macronians, who are their neighbours, say that they have learnt it lately from the Colchians. These are the only races of men who practise circumcision, and these evidently practise it in the same manner as the Egyptians. Of the Egyptians themselves however and the Ethiopians, I am not able to say which learnt from the other, for undoubtedly it is a most ancient custom; but that the other nations learnt it by intercourse with the Egyptians, this among others is to me a strong proof, namely that those of the Phenicians who have intercourse with Hellas cease to follow the example of the Egyptians in this matter, and do not circumcise their children.

Herodotus may have been unable to say that Ethiopia (the African continent) taught Egypt (A corner of Africa) but he certainly knew that Egypt taught Palestine; therefore a fourth source (of many) shows Moses as an interest of study. In that, to understand the Ten Commandments we must understand Moses’ Education. In the schools of Ancient Africa, and even modern Africa, certain Priests learn the Blameless Funeral Rites. In these Funeral Rites, the Priests learn that the dead go before God and other deities to confess to their blamelessness, making a series of “I have not” statements: from Ancient Egypt, we sometimes call these “The 42 Confessions of Maat.” In reviewing the 42 Confessions, one can see that the “Thou shalt not” 10 Commandments are largely an inferior corruption that removed the nuances and added error. That the 10 Commandments are a cornerstone of Christianity which are mostly repeated in Islam, nearly 85% of us unwittingly follow an inferior corruption of our Ancient Truths. Commandments which Moses got directly from Africans not directly from God.

The Commandments (in “King Jame’s” version), the Relevant Confessions and the Errors will be exposed. In the African Blood Siblings, we prepare Africans to “Maroon and Build For Self.” Our Philosophical acumen is advanced enough to independently detect errors in the commandments most of us believe to be perfect. This exercise is written out of love for our race and the realization that a handful of people corrupted our spirituality and a handful of missionaries taught the masses of us religion. It will only take a handful of us to repurify our spirituality for we are endowed by our Creator to restore ourselves.

Many Occidentals wrongly opine, “that a little philosophy makes a man an Atheist: a great deal converts him to religion.” Truthfully, Oriental Philosophy converts one to Religion, but our Original Philosophy converts us to Spirituality. We have been Mis-Educated into another’s way. But fortunate for us Love, Knowledge and Wisdom are weapons against Hate, Ignorance and Error. So that Hate, Ignorance and Error are organized toward our demise, we can die on our lonesome or live against organized wrong with organized right. Each of us must make this choice. Membership in the African Blood Siblings is organized right. Subscribe, share, love.

Nine of the Ten Commandments are Asian Errors
by Onitaset Kumat

First Commandment: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”
Location: Exodus 20:3
Relevant Confession:

“Hail to you, great god, lord of the two Maat goddesses,
I have come to you, my lord, having been brought to see your beauty.
I know you, and I know your name;
I know the names of these forty-two deities
. . .
I have not blasphemed against the primordial deities;”

Error: First notice the similarity with the Confession. We notice that Africans already defer to a Great God as Lord over other deities. In fact, contrary to the Western claim, the Africans, not the Hebrews, were the first Monotheists. Yet Africans were not only the First but also the only Monotheists. This is where the First Commandment’s errors draw. In the Dialogue on Race “Cultural Oppression” is defined as “a means toward moulding toward a culture.” That European and Asians were variably Atheists and Polytheists, we see how this Commandment is actually a flint for conflict. The Hebrews learned from Africans about God, then elevated their Tribe’s God to the one and only and reaked havoc on their neighbors for their own beliefs (see the Second Commandment.) The Christians and Muslims followed suit. Strangely, this is the same Tribalism so common in European circles. It’s also unfit for an African people who had a Great God prior to the existence of either Asia’s or Europe’s. In short, this is an error of ignorance. A dangerous error at that.

Second Commandment: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.”
Location: Exodus 20:4-6
Relevant Confession:

“I have not obstructed a god coming out in procession.”

Error: This is another example of Cultural Oppression. It’s also more ignorance. An Ancient Proverb reads, “If you are searching for a Neter, observe Nature!” A Neter is an aspect of the Great God, the Creator. As such, and understanding the context, that this Asian Commandment is against African people, we must come to understand that what the Asians observed in the Africans was an appreciation of God’s expressions through Nature. This is unlike the Asian who refuses to see God in anything but an external Male. The Biblical verses that come to mind are Exodus 32:1-35. It’s there alleged that Moses’ brother Aaron fashions a calf from the Israelite’s gold which angers their God to the point where Moses must dissuade him from killing all of them after ‘rescuing them’ from Egypt. Moses later seeing it firsthand orders 3,000 slaughtered for this construction while God sends a plague to some survivors. The ethical errors should be self-evident. However reference to the cow bring to mind the Neters (or Neteru (dieities)) Bat and Hathor. Bat was represented as a cow as being an aspect of fertility; Hathor, fertility and motherhood. Apis was another Neter represented as a cow. An informed observer could discern no polytheism at play, no reason to murder a congregation and how the Hebrew God and Moses mistook the meaning of the African practice. Obviously “Omniscience” itself is erroneously depicted.

Third Commandment: “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.”
Location: Exodus 20:7
Relevant Confession:

“I have not blasphemed against god,
. . .
I have not blasphemed against the primordial deities;”

Error: This Commandment is often itself misunderstood. Unbeknownst to most it is an admonition against False Prophets. The error here relates to the emphasis on divine retribution over societal retribution. But also the irony. We observe how the Confessions and the Commandments are parallel, yet the Asians vainly profess God rather than Africans as the direct author, breaking their own Commandment in the process. For instance, the next Commandment clearly indicates that God did not directly author the ten, yet that Moses vainly claims otherwise he sins by his own rules.

Fourth Commandment: “Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.”
Location: Exodus 20:8-11
Relevant Confession:

I have not failed to offer meat on sacrificial days.

Error: The Asians took the seven-day creation of the World as Literal.

Fifth Commandment: “Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.”
Location: Exodus 20:12
Relevant Confession:

“I have not mistreated people.
. . .
I have not taken milk from the mouth of babe;
nor deprived nursling livestock of their fodder.”

Error: An Ancient Proverb applies here: “There are two kinds of error: blind credulity and piecemeal criticism. Never believe a word without putting its truth to the test; discernment does not grow in laziness; and this faculty of discernment is indispensable to the Seeker. Sound skepticism is the necessary condition for good discernment; but piecemeal criticism is an error.” Blind Honours to Parents is erroneous. What’s more, a Corruption can be seen in how the Confessions more emphasize the successors than the predessesors. Clearly this Commandment is another example of Cultural Oppression. This also shows how we should be geared toward our later generation but are backwardly and blindly being geared toward our earlier. This topic was discussed on the Newsletter in “When can a child hit her parent?”

Sixth Commandment: “Thou shalt not kill.”
Location: Exodus 20:13
Relevant Confession:

“I have caused no weeping; I have not killed,
I have given no order to kill, I have caused no one pain.”

Error: Self-Defense. Notice too the nuances of the Confessions removed in the Commandment.

Seventh Commandment: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.”
Location: Exodus 20:14
Relevant Confession:

“I have not copulated with a man; I have not fornicated.”

Error: No Error.

Eighth Commandment: “Thou shalt not steal.”
Location: Exodus 20:15
Relevant Confession:

“I have deprived no craftsman of his property;
. . .
“I have not stolen the cake offerings of the blessed;
. . .
“I have not given half-measure with the bushel
nor shortened the measuring rod when surveying land;
I have not cheated in laying out plots of land;
I have biased no scales
nor skewed the needle on the balance.
I have not taken milk from the mouth of babe;
nor deprived nursling livestock of their fodder.
I have trapped no birds in the reed marshes of the gods,
nor caught fish in their ponds.
I have not retained water when it was time for it to flow,
nor have I dammed up running water.
I have not quenched fire burning bright;
I have not failed to offer meat on sacrificial days.
I have not stolen livestock earmarked for the holy feast.”

Error: The Confessions are more specific with what is considered unethical stealing. Rightly because some theft can be ethical. For instance, the classic “stealing an apple from a shop to feed a family.” There’s a deeper philosophical reason as to why “stealing” is not necessarily unethical. Because “re-stealing” is technically “stealing” yet so too is “possession.” So to speak, “Possession” comes from “Stealing” from others what’s rightly theirs. As to say “the apple” comes from the Earth and therefore belongs to all of us for none of us have a more legitimate stake (How can Public Property become Private Property? [Or more accurately, How can a non-Property become Property?]) Insomuch as the shop possesses an apple that apple was stolen from the starving family. For one to then “re-steal” that fruit, and return it to the public domain, one is doing ethically. As it were, correctly interpreted this commandment would prohibit all possessions, yet this is contrary to Occidental (Western) Philosophy where “Ownership” is a fundamental concept. Interestingly the main confession to concentrate on for the property question is the first. On the question of wages, the following confessions are worth consideration.

Ninth Commandment: “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.”
Location: Exodus 20:16
Relevant Confession:

“I have committed no crimes in the Place of Truth.”

Error: Unlike the Commandment, the Confessions rightly allows the use of Falsehood to Prohibit Injustices. A worthwhile example is when Law and Injustice coincide. For instance, during the African’s enslavement in America, it was Lawful to report a Runaway but also Immoral. This Commandment erroneously promotes the Immoral; which partly explains why the Ten Commandments were alternatively known as “Slave Codes.” In “Maroon and Build For Self” this nomination is more clearly portrayed in the poem “Thou shalt not lie [to the Master]“.

Tenth Commandment: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.”
Location: Exodus 20:17
Relevant Confession:

“My deeds have made men talk and deities rejoice.
I have pleased the god with what he loves.
I have given bread to the hungry, water to the thirsty,
clothes to the naked, a boat to the boatless.”

Error: This is another “How does Public Property become Private Property?” In European and Asian settlements, persons of means are deeply tied to exploitation. More so, those whom are positioned to covet are impoverished by these same exploiters. This commandment thus defends economic disparities and exploitation. In this sense it falls far off the mark. Notice, though, how the relevant confession shows charity as opposed to greed as a reputable quality. This is another example of Cultural Oppression. Showing how “Greed” is reasoned before “Charity” to around 85% of us.  A last point, this admonishment of coveting was repeated in Ancient Africa in other documents; but they too had more substance, hence the introduced errors.

It should be self-evident how our race can benefit by organizing with the African Blood Siblings to restore our Ancient Mores.

Other Posts of Interest:

Maat: The [ . . .] Code of Cardinal Virtues [ . . .]Truth Justice
The 10 Codes of the BlamelessEthical Codes
Originalism Our Philosophy
The [. . . ] Tool [ . . .]: “How is that the North Star?”Analytical Tool
Proof to The Law of Morality200th Post!

Subscribe.  More Posts of Interests to come.  More Racial Uplift to come.

“The African Superhighway of Wisdom” by Asar Imhotep

Listen Siblings, I come in peace,

“One can go to Arusha in Kenya right now and find elder women writing Mdw Ntr [the writing seen in Ancient Egypt] in the sand.” — Asar Imhotep

In the African Blood Siblings we propose the creation of African Blood Siblings Community Centers, communal institutions based around African Love, Knowledge and Wisdom.  This idea is not novel but ancient.  African people have a custom of establishing “Wisdom Traditions” and the following well-researched paper by Asar Imhotep confirms the Lore of the African Blood Siblings (detailing African people–”Originals”) that “In non-intimate relationships, Originals strive toward Master-Student arrangements.  Thereby, always are Originals without Mastery of subjects, seeking those with Mastery of subjects; and those with Mastery of subjects, seeking those without.  Hence, the Original is by nature a Philosopher.”

Asar Imhotep offers us insight into why there is Cultural Continuity all over the African Continent (as detailed here.)  This also shows you that you’re lineage has always been scholastic and in your membership with the African Blood Siblings you can reacquaint our stolen people to our ancient ways.  Ask yourself who you are.  The opportunity for accomplishment only comes from our Prosperous, Independent African Communities.  The creation comes from the African Blood Siblings.  Contact us today.  Subscribe, share, love.

“The African Superhighway of Wisdom”
By Asar Imhotep

[Note: This is best read here: http://www.asarimhotep.com/documents/The_African_Superhighway_of_Wisdom.pdf]

Much has been accomplished in the field of historical linguistics to demonstrate relatedness between African languages. The systematic methods of morphology, phonology and typology have been the tools par excellence in bringing to light similarities in African languages. The principle and most well established tool of the trade is the comparative method. There is however a limit to the comparative method in which all comparatists seek to avoid: language contact. If two or more cultures are in regular contact with each other due to trade, conquest or other reasons, vocabulary (and other innovations) is bound to be shared between languages. In order for the comparative method to be effective, one must eliminate all possibilities of borrowings and this makes it difficult when we try to reconstruct a proto-language from unrelated cultures who share a large amount of lexical items.

A second limitation to the comparative method is that it is very good at telling you “what” about a lexeme, but it does a poor job at telling you “why.” For instance, the Niger-Congo stem -ni- means “soul, spirit and self.” One would ask, “How does the soul relate to the self?” How does the root soul extend to become identified with the self, then a person (mani), then to a king (ani) and then to a character in the Egyptian book of Coming Forth by Day (Ani)? How does Ani of the Book of Coming Forth by Day relate to the Zulu Ena? When the term ni left Africa for Europe and became the word animus (from whence animal derived), how did this relate to totenism in ancient cultures? What did animals symbolize? In order to answer these questions correctly, you can’t simply analyze vocabulary from a dictionary: you have to be a part of a living tradition that explains the expanded meanings of these liturgical terms.

Africa’s system of education is two-fold: 1) you have a revealed front-view of information given to the public and 2) you have a concealed back-view which is reserved for initiates. The information given to those initiated is not given to the lay public and definitely not to any anthropologists. You have to earn the information you seek and being from Oxford university will not get you access to this information. It has been reported by people such as Amadou Hampate Ba that priests are required to lie to those who are not willing to go through the trials and tribulations the normal citizens had to go through to obtain that information. This is why I regard little the information given by historians, anthropologists and linguists who have not been initiated into African systems of thought because they lack the insight, or I should say, they do not possess the keys which unlock the secrets of African cultures.

In regards to ancient Egyptian civilization, when it comes to its development and influence, you basically have two schools of thought in the African-Centered community. The first school assumes that the Nile Valley is the cradle of African civilizations and that all, or most of the cultures of Africa can be traced to the Nile Valley. Some posit that the present-day cultural similarities are “fossilizations” of ancient Egyptian culture. The second school of thought posits that there were even older civilizations in Africa, that due to extreme weather conditions in North Africa, it forced the people of the first civilizations all across to migrate all over Africa causing a population explosion in the Nile Valley in which ancient Egyptian and Nubian civilization is the result. Due to foreign invasions and other strife, over the 3000 years of “alleged” Egyptian history, some groups began to leave the Nile Valley seeking more peaceful conditions and went back into the interior of the continent whose descendents established the modern cultures we see today.

As a result of my years of research on the subject, I say it is a bit of both theories with more weight on the later. The question is, how do you account for all of the so-called Egyptian “fossilizations” in language, iconography, and religious practices all across the continent of Africa; and in some respects the world? If the cultures that we can prove have affinities with ancient Egyptian civilization are in fact remnants of ancient Egyptians, then why do we not see a replication (in full) of ancient Egyptian society in modern times in Africa? A greater question that historians fail to ask is, “If pharaonic Egypt is the result of the assimilation of African cultures over time into one political unit, what ideas are ‘Egyptian’ and what ideas are indigenous to the area?” Maybe this example will make it clearer for the reader. The Edfu text instructs us that a wave of Heru kings from the south of Ta-Meri conquered what is now Egypt and established the first dynasties. It is physically and theoretically impossible to conquer a people if there are in fact no people there to conquer. In other words, the Heru kings conquered an already established civilization with human beings residing there that had their own customs, languages and histories.

What’s most unique about Ta-Meri is that instead of replacing the cultures that existed in the conquered areas, they in-fact incorporated the native cultural ideas into the grander political culture we know today as Ta-Meri. So if this is indeed the case, we are right in asking what is native and what is not? If Egypt was the “New York” of Africa at the time, and the result of the rise of Ta-Meri is based on the influx of peoples from all over Africa, did the people all of a sudden lose ties with their ancestral homes? Did the people all of a sudden forget about where they came from and the routes to get back there? If people travelled from all over the known world to study in Egypt, did ALL of them not return back home to share what they learned?

This poses a dilemma for historians because one cannot logically imply that ALL of the “fossils” that remains in modern African cultures are natively Egyptian. What if some of those concepts are preserved in certain modern cultures because they are in-fact the originators of the ideas and practices in which the ancient Egyptians incorporated into their society? One should be asking, why were there so many “gods” in ancient Egyptian society that served the same functions over time as other “gods”? Why do you have upwards to 10 words in the Egyptian language that represent the same concepts: for example, “to be” or “to exist” or words for “man” and “people.”

The answer to these questions is that there was a continent wide sharing of information in ancient times. For some reason historians are of the mind-set that the Egyptians stayed in one spot and did not travel to LEARN. If some do concede that some Egyptians left Egypt, they do it on the contention that they set off to conquer or teach: never to learn from others. Those of us who are familiar with how indigenous education works on the continent of Africa knows that this cannot be the case. As the Bairu proverb states, “A child who has never left home says my mother is the best cook.” In other words, it is by travelling and learning under various teachers that one gains wisdom. This is true today as it was 8000 years ago.

What historians may not be familiar with is the fact that in Africa, there is a tradition of cross continental education that has existed since before pharaonic times. Because of this tradition, the Africans have established “intellectual trade” routes that Dr. Kykosa Kajangu calls “The Super Highway of Wisdom” that wisdom seekers travelled to gain knowledge of the world and beyond. This super highway of wisdom still exists today and I posit that this is why you see identical philosophies and motifs across Africa and the world in general. Another misconception posed by anthropologists is that things like mountains and deserts were “barriers” for travel among African people. We are to believe that Europeans can survive in mountains and caves in the Caucuses, and brave the ice deserts in the arctic, but Africans do not have the fortitude to traverse the deserts of Africa to see a relative across the continent: the same people who left Africa to populate the earth? We come to find out that this is not the case and in fact is an insult to our intelligence.

I was told about this super highway of wisdom about 10 years ago by an elder master teacher. He informed me at the time that he can go anywhere in Africa and speak to elders who all learned a secret language in which they could speak to each other. This teacher of mine has been initiated into four African sacred societies that I know of. He is most active in the Yoruba system of Ifa. He informed me of some other things which I will not divulge here. Needless to say, he introduced me to an ancient practice of education that despite extreme colonial pressures, it has not been broken. I can say today definitively that this highway does in fact exist and it is the reason why Nommo of the Dogon is found among the Zulu. It is how the Kongo Dikenga became the Four Moments of the Sun in ancient Egypt. It is how the god Itn became Itongo in South Africa.

I speak about this today because we do have initiated scholars who have written about this superhighway of wisdom and it is through their writings that we will get a better understanding of exactly what it is and how African cultures influence each other to this very date. This will also put a stumbling block to those historians who claim there was no contact between Egyptians and other Black African nations. It will also explain why you find certain teachings in one area of Africa and not in the other. I can tell the reader this from the jump; Africa’s education system is hands on. You cannot simply read a lot of text books and get a handle on indigenous knowledge. As Amadou Hampate Ba states, “it is a living tradition.” Nature is the text book and there are certain things you can witness in nature in one location, that you cannot witness in another. This is why one must travel to experience the phenomenon in its natural environment.

There are certain constellations that are not visible in certain parts of the world that you must travel there (at least back in the day) to witness. Certain herbs only grow in one spot. Certain “spirits” are native to certain environments and you must be initiated into how to properly interact with those spirits. This is why the system was set-up. At some point people became familiar with each other and who were great teachers or what not. Obviously they had to keep record of where these people were located. I have always posited that some of the stories of Egyptian texts aren’t stories, but maps to find certain teachers. This is why “Amen” would be a certain God of “this” area as opposed to some other God who is native to another area. It is all codification. Do you think they paid attention to the stars because they were trying to tell time? Or were they trying to get back home from a certain area? This is just something to think about.

Before we move forward we must define what the super highway of wisdom is. This work will primarily just be quotations from scholars who are initiates of African systems speaking about the super highway of wisdom: Credo Mutwa of South Africa, K Bunseki Fu-Kiau of the Kongo, Amadou Hampate Ba of Mali, Priest Apetu of Ghana, Kykosa Kajangu of the Kongo, and Master Naba Lamoussa Morodenibig of Burkina Faso.

It is Dr. Kykosa Kajangu who is responsible for coining the term, “the superhighway of wisdom.” Kajangu provides us with the best definition of the African Super Highway of Wisdom that I have found in print and it is his definition that will guide our study. In his book Wisdom Poetry (2006:131) he states:

I call [the] –superhighway of wisdom the network that makes it possible to establish a dialogue of mutual enrichment among wisdom traditions. No single person is the mother of wisdom; it takes the sweat and tears of countless sages working together over thousands of years to build a wisdom tradition. Even when it is well built, a wisdom tradition cannot flourish alone for it needs to engage in dialogue with other wisdom traditions. It was for this end that ancient African wisdom traditions built a super highway of wisdom, which is still open to this day. (emphasis mine)

Kajangu asserts that in order for a wisdom tradition to thrive, it must engage in dialogues with other centers of wisdom. In ancient, and present, times, people had a hunger for knowledge and would travel the globe to get it. On pg 133 Kajangu further states that:

In the old days, wisdom seekers were constantly on the road looking for sages from whom to learn.

Early we discussed possibly why African cultures have the same symbolism and concepts intheir religious teachings. Most historians posit that this is the result of a common ancestral culture in which all of the modern African cultures developed. These are the ones who posit that the common ancestral culture was that of the Nile Valley. As Dr. Kajangu will inform us, the reason why there are common motifs is because of this superhighway of wisdom in which they have been exchanging ideas for millennia. In his unpublished dissertation titled Beyond the Colonial Gaze (2005), he goes on to state:

The various wisdom traditions in Africa have similar sacred arts because they have engaged in dialogues of mutual enrichment for thousands of years. It is possible to use the sacred arts to build a –super-highway of pre-Western modes of thought and being that can aid post-postcolonial scholars [initiated scholars] in their efforts to develop compelling theories about the field of indigenous African wisdom traditions. (emphasis mine)

The most detailed account of this tradition, however, comes from Amadou Hampate Ba in his article titled The Living Tradition in UNESCO’s General History of Africa Vol.1. He provides for us the ins and outs of this practice and it gives us some insight on how it was carried out in ancient times. His citation is going to be a bit lengthy, but it is necessary so that we get an accurate understanding of the dynamics and purpose of this method of education. As we will see, Hampate Ba echoes many of the sentiments stated by Kajangu.

Amadou Hampate Ba discusses the life of a doma, or traditionalist, in the societies of the Fulani and the Bambara. He affirms the notion that one does not become wise by only learning in one’s own village and why he must travel to gain more knowledge. He goes on to state (1976:194):

Generally speaking, one does not become a doma-traditionalist by staying in one’s village. A healer who wants to deepen his knowledge has to travel so as to learn about the different kinds of plants and study with other masters of the subject. The man who travels discovers and lives other initiations, notes the differences or similarities, broadens the scope of his understanding. Wherever he goes he takes part in meetings, hears historical tales, and lingers where he finds a transmitter of tradition who is skilled in initiation or in genealogy, in this way he comes into contact with the history and traditions of the countries he passes through.

One can see that the man who has become a doma-traditionalis has been a seeker and a questioner all his life and will never cease to be one. The African of the savannah used to travel a great deal. The result was exchange and circulation of knowledge. That is why the collective historical memory in Africa is seldom limited to one territory. Rather it is linked with family lines or ethnic groups that have migrated across the continent.

Many caravans used to plough their way across the country using a network of special routes traditionally protected by gods and kings (…) Upon arrival in a strange country travelers would go and ‘entrust their heads‘ to some man of standing who would thereby become their guarantor, for ‘to touch the stranger is to touch the host himself.‘ The great genealogist is necessarily always a great traveler. While a dieli [djele, griot] may rest content with knowing the genealogy of the particular family he is attached to, for a true genealogist – dieli or no – to increase in knowledge he has to travel about the country to learn the main ramifications of an ethnic group and then go trace the history of the branches that have emigrated.

African Proverbs that deal with the Super Highway of Wisdom

  • A child who has never left home says, “my mother is the best cook.”
  • The child who travels far excels the elder of old time
  • Those who have seen very little talk too much But those who have seem a great deal cannot find words to explain what they have gone through

Amadou Hampate Ba instructs us that sages used to travel great distances to learn and that this system integrated people from across the continent. This is very important because those who do concede that some travel took place in Africa, they claim that Africans did not travel outside of their immediate area to do so. Hampate Ba clears that up for us.

Due to colonialism, Africans have had to keep quiet about this ancient practice because of fear of death by imperial powers. Dr. Fu-Kiau in his work African Cosmology of the Bantu Kongo tells us about how the once open schools of initiation had to go underground after Europeans came into the Kongo. He states:

Because of their closed door policy to the non-initiated [biyinga], colonial powers decreed these institutions as dangerous to the survival of colonization. Consequently, these institutions were destroyed without taking into consideration their social, cultural, educational, spiritual or moral values. Many of their unyielding leading masters [ngudia-nganga] were executed or jailed for life. The remaining masters took these institutions underground for hundreds of years for fear of reprisal from both the colonial and religious powers. (Fu-Kiau 2001:128-129)

This statement is very important because scholars have argued that these “secret” institutions did not exist. But more so this affirms a practice that has been going on since pharaonic times. For when invaders penetrate into African societies, the priesthood always goes underground in an effort to preserve the teachings and the culture. Amadou Hampate Ba in Aspects of African Civilization: Person, Culture, Religion (1972) confirms this practice in Mali as he notes:

As we have seen, African knowledge is a global knowledge, a living knowledge, and it is because the old people are themselves the last depositories of this knowledge that they can be compared to vast libraries whose multiple shelves are connected by invisible links which constitute precisely this “science of the invisible”, authenticated by the chains of transmission through initiation.

In the past, this knowledge was transmitted regularly from generation to generation by rites of initiation and various forms of traditional education. This regular transmission was interrupted because of an external, extra-African action: the impact of colonization. The colonial powers arrived with their technological superiority, their own methods and their own ideal of life, and did everything in their power to substitute their own way of life for that of the Africans. Just as one never seeds fallow ground, the colonial powers were obliged to “clear” the African tradition to be able to plant their own tradition.

Thus from the outset the Western school began to do battle with the traditional African school and to hunt down the keepers of traditional knowledges. This was the époque when all healers were thrown in prison as “charlatans” or for “practicing medicine without a license.” It was also the era when children were prevented from speaking their mother tongue in order to shield them from traditional influences, to such an extent that at school, a child who was caught speaking his mother tongue had to wear a board called a “symbol” on which was drawn the head of a donkey, and he was not allowed to eat lunch.

…During the colonial period, transmission by initiation, which used to take place on a great holiday and at regular intervals, sought asylum by going underground.

This also happened in ancient Egypt and is why some of their teachers spread across the continent: to preserve Egyptian teachings. This is why ancient Egyptian concepts are not openly displayed in Africa. On a continent where Christianity and Islam have forced their way into societies and taken over traditional roles, it is understandable why certain aspects of the ancient traditions are kept secret from the public and uninitiated anthropologists. Some things are reserved for the priesthoods. The Egyptian priesthoods are not dead: they simply have new names. One can go to Arusha in Kenya right now and find elder women writing Mdw Ntr in the sand. In certain priesthoods in West Africa, after a certain amount of years in the priesthood, you learn the fundamentals of Mdw Ntr. What was once an open system has now been driven underground where only a few have directly and indirectly written about these practices.

Credo Mutwa, in Indaba my Children, talks about how the priesthood had to go underground when the Europeans came into South Africa. Not only that, he states they were doing a practice that they have done before – thousands of years ago with the Phoenicians. In describing the nature of the priesthood, and how the priests spread all over central and south Africa, he states that (1964:555-6):

When the White Man came to Africa, bringing Christianity with him, the Custodians of the Belief urged the chiefs and chieftainesses of the tribes to resist the ‘Strange Ones‘ and their alien creed. But when the Bantu were finally defeated they did what they had done nearly three thousand years before when the Ma-Iti (Phoenicians) invaded the lands of the tribes: to ensure that the Great Belief would not die, they selected a number of men, and women, from every tribe and binding them by a series of High Oaths, they told them everything there was to know about the Belief. There are so many High Legends to remember and so many stores of holy men, chiefs and witchdoctors that no human mind can hold all these and yet remain sane. A custodian elect had to know so much that there was the great danger of forgetting many things, leaving what could be remembered in an inaccurate or distorted form.

There was only one way to solve this problem. The Great Knowledge was divided into many parts and subdivisions. Men were then chosen from different walks of life – blacksmiths, woodcarvers, medicine men, and others from each tribe. The blacksmiths were told everything about the history of metal-working in the lands of the Bantu, the characteristics of the various kinds of metal and how to recognize the minerals from which these can be produced. They were told all the legends appertaining to metal and the rites and ceremonies a blacksmith must perform, and what laws he must obey, and why. The Chosen Blacksmith was under High Oath and sworn to secrecy, commanded to impart all this knowledge to his sons, and they to their sons, without adding or subtracting a single word.

The same thing was done to the Medicine-men, the Tribal Narrators, the Woodcarvers and so forth. Then, in every tribe the High Custodian formed a Hidden Brotherhood of High Custodians (Secret Society) whose duty it was continually to watch the Chosen Custodians ensuring that they had not forgotten anything, allowed nothing to leak to strangers, and imparted to chiefs and certain elders, and Indunas what they were required to know.

The Hidden Brotherhood was also there for all the Chosen Ones to Report to annually for additional checks, clarification, confirmation, and to receive new knowledge acquired in the meantime. The Hidden Fraternity also met in places where the young Chosen Ones were made to take oaths when they assumed duty. The most important obligation was to swear never to reveal the identity of any one of the High Hidden Ones, who were given (and still are given) the reverence and the respect of a Lesser God.

This is very critical information. The most important thing is the affirmation that a body of knowledge is dispersed across the continent (in fragments) and that in secret these priests meet to discuss priest business. This will be supported by high priest Apetu from Ghana further below. But for now we will review another quote from Mutwa which establishes in ancient times (and to this date) a grand BANTU culture in which these ideas were shared. He informs us that:

Among our somewhat varied early mythological legends there are versions reporting that the Tree of Life brought forth many different kinds of men. Some were big with ugly faces like that of a hippopotamus, and who walked on all fours. Others could fly like bats and yet others crawled like snakes. One day the Great Spirit tested all these different kinds in a variety of ways – in racing, fighting and numerous other endurance tests – and all these were won by muntu, the ‘two-legger‘. About these legends anon.

Now the common stock, the ancestral tribe from which all the Negroid tribes of Africa sprang, was known as the Batu, or the Bantu. Legends say that this stock lived in the ‘Old Land‘. According to all African folklore all our culture and religions were born in this Old Land‘. This was far back in the bone and stone ages.

Where was this ‘Old Land’ It is there where the –’Old Tribes‘ are still found today – the Watu Wakale. These incorporate all the tribes of the land of the Bu-Kongo right up to the southern parts of the land of the Ibo and Oyo (Nigeria). These tribes belong to the basic stock of all such tribes who identify themselves with the prefix Ba. They are the Ba-Mileke, Ba-Mbara, Ba-Kongo, Ba-Ganda, Ba-Hutu, Ba-Luba, Ba-Tonka, Ba-Saka, Ba-Tswana, Ba-Kgalaka, Ba-Venda, Ba-Pedi, Ba-Sutu and Ba-Chopi. The southern offshoots – the Ba-Pedi, Ba-Venda, Ba-Kgalaka and Ba-Tswana – are the oldest Bantu tribes south of the level of the Limpopo and their histories within these regions go back to a thousand years BC.

All these tribes are direct offshoots of the great Ba-Ntu nation that lived in the ‘Old Land‘, as a properly organized tribe, a full 4,500 years ago, reckoned according to the genealogies. The Ba-Mileke of the Camerouns is so old that these tribesmen still speak the language their witchdoctors call ‘spirit talk’, which came down to us {the Zulus} through the Ba-Kongo and the Ba-Mbara. We use this language when communicating with the very old spirits of the ‘Ancient Ones’. This language is actually the language of the Stone Age – the first efforts by man to speak. It consists largely of grunts and guttural animal sounds in which the words we use today are faintly distinguishable.

Mutwa confirmed one of my elders sayings of their being a priestly language among the elders on the continent. Mutwa doesn’t discuss how wide spread this language is and only regulates it in the quote above to Cameroon and the Kongo. Chiekh Anta Diop also confirms the notion of a secret language among the elders of the Kabompo district of Zaire in Civilization or Barbarism. He states (1991:320):

The Woyo have a hieroglyphic writing system, the study of which has been recently undertaken by a Belgian ethnologist, according to Nguvulu Lubundi. In Zambia, an Austrian researcher, Dr. Gerhard Kubik of the Vienna University’s Institute of Ethnology, has recently discovered ideograms called Tusona, of a philosophic meaning that are known only by the old men who speak the Luchazi language in the Kabompo district; he is in the process of studying them. Therefore it is not by chance that a statuette of Osiris was found in situ in an archeological layer in Shaba, a province of Zaire.

Master Naba of Burkina Faso was an initiated healer who travelled the world teaching African science and philosophy and set up a school in Chicago called The Earth Center. Master. Naba passed away in the summer of 2008. Before he died I had a chance to interview him and he brought out some information, again that was taught in sacred circles, that confirmed Mdw Ntr was not a spoken language; just a written language. As Dr. Boulos Ayad Ayad asserts (http://www.copticlang.com/cl-two-systems.php):

Chain has presented a copious and detailed study and has indicated that the Egyptian language is not a spoken language is so far as it is basically derived from Coptic, assuming that Coptic is the origin, and that the Egyptian language was used by the priests and the scribes in their written work only.

This means that the Egyptian language is the language of the Egyptian who spoke in Coptic and who used this language for scriptural purposes only. This Egyptian language was only known to scribes and totally unknown to the public.19

However, on Master Naba Lamoussa Morodenibig‘s website, he discusses the nature of the Dogon that is real instructive for us in this paper. He states:

Contrary to popular belief, the Dogons are not just a small tribe that lives in Mali; Dogons are composed of many different bloodlines that represent the elite of the Pharaonic society. Dogon bloodlines include the families of: Naba (healers/priests), Woba (farmers), Yonlis (guardians of the kingship), Kediou (builders), Mende (blacksmiths), etc. These bloodlines can be found in tribes such as Gourmantche, Chibisi, Dogomba, Farafara, Sonike, Germa, etc. The Dogons once lived in the Nile Valley, but migrated inland during the invasion around 400 BC. Today, the Dogons can be found living by the bend in the Niger River.

The name –Dogon comes from the word –dogou, which means land. The Dogons are considered the “landlords” of Africa and their culture aims at preserving the Earth and everything that lives on it. The Dogon culture has remained uninterrupted since the time of the Pharaohs. The Dogons can be seen as Kemetic people who, during the periods of invasion, migrated so that their culture and spirituality could be kept pure. Due largely to the facts that the Dogon culture now resides in a land-locked area and that the Dogon possess deep spiritual knowledge, the culture has been preserved from colonial interruptions and influence. This cultural and spiritual preservation also is the result of very strong and strict rules of initiation (the mode by which initiation knowledge is passed from generation to generation.)

The recent works The Science of the Dogon and Sacred Symbols of the Dogon by Laird Scranton definitely confirms this statement. What’s interesting about this quote is the notion, again, of priesthoods separated by occupation, that belong to one larger priesthood (called the Dogons), which echoes in a similar manner as expressed by Credo Mutwa of the Zulus. By studying Dogon society you get a real sense of what pharaonic culture was like. They are in fact ancient Egyptians and their sacred symbols confirm it.

To confirm that this practice of travelling for knowledge is not only a west and central African thing, we will again quote Mutwa who informs us of his own travels and initiations all across Central, East and South Africa. In his book Zulu Shaman: Dreams, Prophecies and Mysteries, he tells us that (1996:18):

After I had ended initiation under my grandfather and under my mother‘s sister Mynah, I wanted to learn more, so I went to Swaziland and studied there under great healers while earning a living both as a healer and as a laborer and sending money back to my father and the rest of my family. From Swaziland I went to Mozambique, which was then under Portuguese control, and there I studied under Mombai traditional healers and under Shangon sangomas and Tsonga nyangas. There I learned even more than I had learned under my grandfather. I went on to Rhodesia – today called Zimbabwe. Wherever I went in Africa, there I knelt before great teachers and I learned. I discovered how insignificant my Western education was, and how inadequate and how false in many aspects – especially where knowledge of Africa is concerned.

There are several things that the astute reader should be asking him/herself. The first question is, “How did he know where to go to find certain teachers to learn under?” How did he meet the challenge of language differences in these respective countries? How were his experiences similar or different in these ports along the super highway of wisdom? Did he take what he learned in all of these places and taught members of his own society?

These are very important questions to answer. It is impossible to visit all of these countries for initiation to study and NOT share terms and concepts. One only goes through initiation because one feels that the wisdom gained through the experience is valuable in a practical sense, for everyday practical purposes. As we can see, Mutwa went through several initiations, which means he found these types of experiences valuable and practical.

For those who have spoken with brother Mutwa knows that he has travelled farther then south East Africa for initiations. To my knowledge he has travelled as far as Cameroon to the Sudan for initiations. He even went to Australia to learn under the indigenous there. When people read his book Indaba My Children, they may be under the impression that all of the stories told are Zulu stories. This is in fact not true. Brother Mutwa created a seamless story out of countless stories he has gained through initiations all across Africa. These are the histories of various African groups. If one pays attention to the book, one will realize that it chronicles the movement of the Bantu from Cameroon to the Sudan to South Africa. As Mutwa notes:

It is through these stories that we are able to reconstruct the past of the Bantu of Africa. It is through these stories that intertribal friendship or hatred was kept alive and burning; that the young were told who their ancestors were, who their enemies were and who their friends were. In short, it is these stories that have shaped Africa as we know it—years and years ago. . . .(Mutwa 1964: xiii).

Dr. Kykosa Kajangu is one of Credo Mutwa’s students, who like Mutwa, travelled on the super highway of wisdom in which South Africa was one of his stops. He informs us in his work Beyond the Colonial Gaze about how Mutwa constructed the stories for Indaba My Children.

Drawing from these teachings, Mutwa was able to craft a cosmological poem with which he starts his book Indaba My Children. He wrote an initiatory text called The Sacred Story of The Tree of Life. This text is not a Zulu cosmological poem; rather, it is Mutwa‘s rendition of the ideas about creation from the Tonga and Tonga Ila wisdom traditions. During his initiation in pre-Western modes of thought and being in these wisdom traditions, Mutwa memorized certain symbols and initiatory texts that he used as a background to craft a cosmological poem.

This is very important information to digest, because just as Credo Mutwa (one man) was able to travel along the super highway of wisdom, collect information, and retell it in a manner that is relevant to him and his people, this was/is the exact practice of ancient and modern African people (and in fact the world over).

If you are to travel along the African super highway of wisdom, one of the first things that African sages will tell you is to “Speak in your own name, never in mind [sic].” Dr. Kajangu puts this concept into perspective in his work Wisdom Poetry. He explains this philosophy as such (2006:135):

The second fundamental principle about traveling on the superhighway of wisdom is speaking in one’s name. Every sage that I have so far encountered on my journey to wisdom has told me as he/she was told by their mentors: “Speak in your name, never in mine.” What does this mean? Sages will tell you to nourish your mind with teachings that have been enriched by countless generations of sages, but they insist that you must remain truthful to the voice that brought you into life or the voice of your destiny. (emphasis mine)

It is vitally important for any student of Africa, its philosophy and traditions to understand what has just been said. It is the very reason why you find similarities in symbolism, but not exact replicas across the continent. Historians have been of the belief that in order for something to be “Egyptian” that it has to look EXACTLY like how the ancient Egyptians did it. That is not keeping with African tradition. African tradition discourages direct copying of ideas. The goal is critical analysis. Sages who dwell in wisdom centers across the continent do not want to make robots out of human beings (where they spit back what has been programmed into them). The goal is to integrate the knowledge obtained in one’s own life in a way that new revelations and techniques come out of YOUR own unique experiences.

This cannot happen if you are spoon-fed all there is to know. This is why African sages rarely answer a question directly. They will ask you a question in return and force you to come up with your own answers. This fosters critical thinking and discourages dogma as a paradigm. As Jordan Ngubane would often say, “Dogma is a prison of the mind.” So speaking in your own name allows you to be different and to come with your own conclusions. This is in alignment with the African concept of simultaneous validity which states that human beings cluster together in response to the challenges of their environment. How they choose to identify themselves, in response to those challenges, is their right as divine beings. Their philosophies, their customs and traditions are valid, important and legitimate. No people can prescribe destiny for other human beings and it is their duty to shape their reality in a manner that meets the challenges of their environment.

It is with this philosophy of “speaking in one’s own name” and “simultaneous validity” that Iten of Egypt becomes Itongo of South Africa. It is how Esu of the Yorubas become Yeshua (Jesus) of the Christian faith. It is how the pyramids of the Nile Valley become the Pyramids of Mexico (with different styles). It is how the spiritual customs of the Mande become the motifs we see in Olmec civilization in Mexico. It is how Amen of the Egyptians becomes Imana of Rwanda. It is how the Egyptian Skhai (meaning to celebrate a festival) becomes the Dogon Sigui festival. This exchange of ideas has been going on since before written records and it is this African social practice that makes it difficult for Africanists to pinpoint the origins of ideas without being initiated into African educational systems where they can find out.

To underscore just how prevalent this ancient practice was, recall the story of Makeda Queen of Sheba and King Solomon of the Bible. There are two records of their interaction: The Bible and the Kebra Nagast. The Bible focuses on their relationship on a meeting of the minds and exchanging gifts. The Kebra Negast or the Book of the Glory of the Kings (of Ethiopia) goes a little bit further and speaks on an intimate relationship that resulted in the birth of Menelik. For those that recall the story, Makeda sent her servant Tamrin to King Solomon of Israel to secure trade routes between the two kingdoms. Upon Tamrin’s return, he told her about Solomon’s wealth and power. After much thought, Makeda decides to make the long and arduous trip to Isreal to “prove him with hard questions” (Kebra Nagast Chapter 24; African Heritage Study Bible 1 King 10:1;2). King Solomon was famous for his wisdom through proverbs and parables. The hard questions Makeda wanted to “prove him” referred to the uncovering of the meaning of his parables and proverbs. In other words, she travelled from Ethiopia to Israel to experience the wisdom of a master teacher named Solomon. Nowhere in the book did it state that Israel was too far. The unquenchable thirst for knowledge made the journey worth while.

What should be apparent from this example is in the fact that this had to be a common practice for the Queen to just up and leave with the objective of obtaining wisdom. Makeda, Queen of Sheba, was following an ancient tradition of travelling the super highway of wisdom.

My last example of this practice comes from the year 2009 in Ghana. In March of 2009, on a Blog Talk Radio program (www.blogtalkradio.com) titled The Ancestral Study Group hosted by Abongo, Sister Nikki and Brother Ankha out of New York and Atlanta, they interviewed a master teacher by the name of Apetu who is the advisor to a group called MAMA out of Atlanta, GA. Apetu lives in Kuko village in Yendi in Northern Ghana. Apetu is of the royal lineage and a very powerful priest among the Dagomba people. Yendi is the capital for all of the Dagomba people of Northern Ghana.

During the radio interview Apetu talks about his education in various African wisdom traditions. He noted that his studies started in his home of Yendi as a young child. After completing his education in his village, he felt that there was more to know, so he left his village to go study for 3 years in Togo. From Togo he went to Benin and Dahomy to learn the spirits and Gods of those people. He stayed in Benin for 7 years. He said he had to stay long there because it was really tough having to learn all of the deities that reside there. He mentioned that the elders really liked him because he stayed a long time, so they dispensed a lot of information upon him. From there he went to Nigeria to study for two years. This is where he learned English. From Nigeria he went to Senegal to study for 3 years, where he learned that language and French. From Senegal he went back home to Ghana to become family head of his father’s house.

What’s important for our purposes here is that he is considered a very powerful shaman in his village because he travelled so extensively and learned so many secrets from various ethnic groups. Again one has to ask, how did he know where to go after each initiation to learn more? There had to be an already established system in place for him to partake of. Brother Abongo, one of the hosts of the show, is one of his students out of Atlanta. Those very teachings have made its way from Ghana, Togo, Benin, Nigeria, Senegal to the United States. This same practice, as has already been established, is just part of an ancient tradition that believes one must travel and study amongst other human beings to gain knowledge. Not only that, but that one must integrate it and make it unique and applicable for your family and people back home.

Conclusion

What I have attempted to establish here is the knowledge of a super highway of wisdom that is responsible for the mutual sharing of signs, symbols, ideas and customs from initiated scholars who have themselves travelled along these roads. This practice is as old as Africa itself and it is this practice that wreaks havoc on the comparative method as the primary tool for establishing the relatedness of peoples and cultures. By a careful examination of what has been presented here today, we should be able to understand better why you have so many ideas that are present in the rest of Black Africa in ancient Egypt and vice versa. Dr. Yosef Ben Jochannan, another initiated scholar, talks about the Free Mason type lodge system that existed in ancient Ta-Meri (1990:67) and still exists to this date. Now we have added support to substantiate his claims of the Egyptian priesthood with “lodges” stretching from Egypt, to Palestine, Rome to Monomotapa to Zimbabwe.

Language contact makes it difficult for philologists to compare languages because it makes it harder to establish what is loan and what is indigenous. With our knowledge of the superhighway of wisdom, those may not even be relevant questions any more. The African Super Highway of Wisdom also dispels the concept of “chance” resemblance. Although a culture may be separated by thousands of miles, they still could have had contact with each other by way of mutual enrichment which makes possible the shared lexical items and motifs; without adopting a whole language system. This also explains why you do not find a full language cognate with ancient Egyptian: it is a written language only used to write the many languages of Africa for communication.

Below I have displayed evidence of a shared spiritual system that goes back hundreds of thousands of years. Examine these motifs below and see how the philosophy of simultaneous validity and “speaking in your own name” is translated into experience for African people.

Ancestrally

Asar Imhotep

http://www.asarimhotep.com
15

Ba, Amadou Hampate. (1981). The Living Tradition. In General History of Africa Vol. 1: Methodology and African Prehistory. Heinemann/UNESCO. University of California Press: 166-205.

Ben-Jochannan, Yosef A. A. (1990). The African Called Rameses (The Great) II and the African Origin of Western Civilization. Self Published.

Conyers Jr., James L. (2003). Afrocentricity and the Academy: Essays on Theory and Practice. McFarland Publishing. Jefferson, NC.

Fu-Kiau, K. Bunseki (2001). African Cosmology of the Bantu Kongo: Principles of Life and Living. Anthelia Henrietta Press. Canada

Kajangu, Kykosa. (2005). Beyond the Colonial Gaze: Reconstructing African Wisdom Traditions. Unpublished PhD dissertation

______ (2006). Wisdom Poetry. Blooming Twig Books. East Setauket, NY Mutwa,

V. Credo. (1964). Indaba My Children: African Folktales. Grove Press. New York, NY.

_____ (1996). Zulu Shaman: Dreams, Prophecies and Mysteries. Destiny Books. Rochester, Vermont

Scranton, Laird. (2007). Sacred Symbols of the Dogon: The Key To Advanced Science in the Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs. Inner Traditions. Rochester, VM.
16
African Motifs

[See PDF for Images of Cultural Continuity throughout Africa (from Writing, to Ideas, to Architecture and more.)]

Source: http://www.asarimhotep.com/documents/The_African_Superhighway_of_Wisdom.pdf

Dr. Ben’s “The Nile Valley Civilization and the Spread of African Culture”

Listen Siblings, I come in peace,

“If I was ruling England and you came to run for a beauty contest, you could be disqualified even before you came. You’re talking about racism; why not? This isn’t your country. You cannot run for a beauty contest in a white man’s country. You don’t see any Europeans winning any beauty contest in China, Japan or India; but the funny thing is that they come and win one in Nigeria. As a matter of fact Miss Trinidad was a white girl. Miss Barbados also a white girl, and Miss Jamaica was a white girl, all of them in a Black country. And this is what I’m saying. You can call it racist, but you know I’m telling the truth.” — Dr. Yosef ben-Jochannan (Dr. Ben)

Even I get tired.  The greatest benefit to an African people is insight into their Ancient ways.  This, Dr. Ben, myself, and other worthwhile scholars give in abundance.

Still, some Africans bicker on ‘discrimination,’ ‘racism’ and ‘white supremacy,’ never heeding the necessity of rebuilding in the fashion of our ancients.

What fashion in particular?  Below Dr. Ben shares our historical legacy in great detail and precision.  As he always does–read here.  Yet what should be most important to the African Blood Siblings is that Maat (as we detailed here) is the Goddess of Justice and Law.  This should inform an intelligent conversation.

Today, what is Moral does not need to be Legal and vice versa; a restoration of our mores must restore morality to our legal system (ironically, the African Blood Siblings wrote “The Law of Morality.”)

This then informs how we proceed in our creativity for a better future.  African Blood Siblings Community Centers will be bastions of Law and Justice, giving for our people an African system of self-governance, instantly depriving the Prison-Industrial Complex of our young, and reviving for our masses a sense of dignity and self-worth through knowledge of our cultural continuity and ancestral morality that can survive the ever-present assault on our spiritual togetherness.

In no sense should we cower now.  It’s time to move forward in a righteous organization. Write the African Blood Siblings to get started.  Join this most noble struggle.  Subscribe, share, love.

The Nile Valley Civilization and the Spread of African Culture
By Yosef ben-Jochannan

(A lecture delivered for the Minority Ethnic Unit of the Greater London Council, London, England, March 6–8, 1986. It was addressed mainly to the African community in London consisting of African people from the Caribbean and African people from Africa.)


When we speak of the Nile Valley, of course we are talking about 4,100 miles of civilization, or the beginning of the birth of what is today called civilization. I can go to one case of literature in particular which will identify the Africans as the beginners of the civilization to which I refer. And since I am not foreign to the works of Africans in Egypt, otherwise called Egyptians, I think that should be satisfactory proof. This proof is housed in the London Museum that is holding artifacts of Egypt. In that museum you will find a document called the Papyrus of Hunifer. At least you should find it there. It was there when Sir E. A. Wallace Budge used it in his translation as part of the Egyptian Book of the Dead and the Papyrus of Hunifer.

It was there at that time, a copy of which is in the library of Syracuse University in New York, and I quote from the hieratic writing, “We came from the beginning of the Nile where God Hapi dwells, at the foothills of The Mountains of the Moon.” “We,” meaning the Egyptians, as stated, came from the beginning of the Nile. Where is “the beginning of the Nile?” The farthest point of the beginning of the Nile is in Uganda; this is the White Nile. Another point is in Ethiopia. The Blue Nile and White Nile meet in Khartoum; and the other side of Khartoum is the Omdurman Republic of Sudan. From there it flows from the south down north. And there it meets with the Atbara River in Atbara, Sudan. Then it flows completely through Sudan (Ta-Nehisi, Ta-Zeti or Ta-Seti, as it was called), part of that ancient empire which was one time adjacent to the nation called Meroe or Merowe. From that, into the southern part of what the Romans called “Nubia,” and parallel on the Nile, part of which the Greeks called “Egypticus”; the English called it “Egypt” and the Jews in their mythology called it “Mizrain” which the current Arabs called Mizr/Mizrair. Thus it ends in the Sea of Sais, also called the Great Sea, today’s Mediterranean Sea. When we say thus, we want to make certain that Hapi is still God of the Nile, shown as a hermaphrodite having the breasts of a woman and the penis of a man. God Hapi is always shown tying two symbols of the “Two Lands,” Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt, during Dynastic Periods, or from the beginning of the Dynastic Periods. The lotus flower is the symbol of the south, and the papyrus plant, the symbol of the north.

But we need to go back beyond Egypt. I used “Egypt” as a starting point, in that of all the ancient civilizations in the world, Egypt has more ancient documents and other artifacts than any other civilization one could speak of. So when you hear them talking about “Sumer” and “Babylon,” and all those other places, theoretically, they can’t show you the artifacts. Thus my position is, first hand information is the best proof; and I can show you the bones and other remains of Zinjanthropus Boisei about 1.8 million years ago. But no one can show me the bones and remains of Adam and Eve, et al.

So I have the proof and you have the belief. If you want to see it you can go to the Croydon National Museum in Nairobi, Kenya; there, you’ll see the Bones Zinjanthropus Boisei. If you want to see the remains of “Lucy,” you can go to the national Museum associated with the University of Addis Ababa. Of course, there are a host of other human fossils that existed thousands of years ago all over Africa; but you can’t find one “Adam” or one “Eve” in any part of Asia.

But we have to go beyond that. We can look at the artifacts before writing came into being. We will then be in archaeological finds along the Nile. Also you would find that there were two groups of Africans; one called “Hutu,” and one called “Twa.” The Twa and Hutu take us back into at least 400,000 B.C.E. (Before the Common “Christian” Era) in terms of artifacts. The most ancient of these artifacts, one of the most important in Egypt, is called the “Ankh,” which the Christians adopted and called the “Crux Ansata” or “Ansata Cross.” The Ankh was there amongst these people, equally the “Crook” and “Flail.” All of these symbols came down to us from the Twa and Hutu. You know the Twa by British anthropologists who called them “pygmies.” There is no such thing in Africa known as a “pygmy,” much less “pygmies.” But the people call themselves Twa and Hutu, so that’s what they are.

If we look at the southern tip of Africa, a place called “Monomotapa,” before the first Europeans came there with the Portuguese in 1486, C.E./A.D. (Christian Eera), a man called Captian Bartholomew Diaz, and subsequently another European and his group came, one called Captain Vasco da Gama, who came there ten years later in 1496; when they came to that part of Africa they met another group of people there as well, which they called “Kaffirs.” Now this is a long time before the Boers came there in 1652. When the Boers came those Africans may have gone to the moon on vacation (or there they “didn’t meet any natives” [Africans] so they say. But one thing is certain, that Bartholomew Diaz and Vasco da Gama had already left records showing that when they arrived there at Monomotapa the Khaffirs [Africans], including the small ones (Khoi-Khoi, and Khalaharis) (remember I didn’t say “Bushmen” or “Hottentots,” that’s nonsense, the racist names given them by the British and Dutch Boers), were already there.

So with all of these people that were found in this area we could go back at least 35,000 to 40,000 years to another group of people who left their writings and their pictures. Those people are called Grimaldi. The Grimaldi were there in the southern tip of Africa, and traveled up the entire western coast, then came to the northwestern coast of Africa, and crossed into Spain. Not only in Spain, but all the way up to Austria; it was found that the Grimaldi had traveled and left their drawings in caves all along the way. In the Museum of Natural History, New York City, New York, you can see Grimaldi paintings going back to at least 35,000 years ago. I remind you that it is only about 31,000 years before Adam and Eve! It is very important you realize that, the next time you talk about Adam and Eve. So we are told that there is an Adam and Eve that started the world, but that is a “Jewish world” and I’m talking about before Abraham, the first Jew.

The country that I am talking about now goes back to a period called the Sibellian Period. Sibellian I brings us to a period where you will find hieratic writings, the type that no one in modern times has been able to decipher. Sibellian II existed about 25,000 years before the birth of Jesus-the Christ. Sibillian III would bring us to about 10,000 B.C.E., in which we now have the Stellar Calendar that I spoke about, and the pre-dynastic period will be considered from the same, 10,000 to 6,000 B.C.E., and that is the point when High Priest Manetho, in about 227 or 226 B.C.E., attempted to present for the Greeks, who had imposed upon him to write a kind of chronological history of the Nile Valley. Europeans, instead of saying what Manetho said in his chronology of the history of the Nile Valley, forget to say it was at the end of the Nile Valley he addressed. For example, the “First Cataract,” i.e., an obstruction in the Nile River, is at a place called the City of Aswan, when in fact it is the last; the “Sixth Cataract” is in fact Aswan, Upper (or Southern) Egypt.

This is important to understand, because Egypt, which most of us deal with and forget the rest of the Nile Valley, is not at the beginning of the Nile Valley high cultures, but the end. High culture came down the Nile; but if you go on the Nile you will always hear about the “pyramids of Egypt.” Yes, they are the “world’s largest”; they will blow your mind, so to speak, but they are not the first pyramids of Africa; they are the last. There are thirty-two pyramids in Sudan, none in Ethiopia, and seventy-two in Egypt. What happened is that as the Africans became much more competent in engineering, etc., they increased the size of their pyramids in sophistication; thus at the end of the Nile you could see different forms and the colossal pyramids, the largest being one by Pharaoh Khufu, whom Herodotus called Cheops, and that would be one of the pyramids built in the 4th Dynasty. The first of the pyramids of Egypt being that by Imhotep, for his Pharaoh Djoser/Sertor (“Zozer”), the third pharaoh of the Third Dynasty. The architect was the multi-genus, Imhotep, who introduced to mankind the first structure ever built out of stone, and with joints without mortar of any other binding materials.

Now you could understand if I said that the pyramids in Sudan ore older than the pyramids in Egypt, and I simultaneously say that Imhotep built the first stone structure known by man, it would seem to be a contradiction. It is not a contradiction, because those in Sudan were built by two methods. There were some pyramids called silt pyramids, and the second method was mud-brick pyramids. Not the type of “bricks made of mud and straw” mentioned in the Hebrew Holy Torah, specifically the Book of Exodus. That has to be made clear. How did the silt pyramids come about? That type of pyramid came about due to the Inundation Period of the Nile River. This was the period when the Nile River overflowed its banks bringing down the silt from the highlands of Ethiopia and Uganda, and from the Mountain of the Moon, which the people of Kenya called Kilimanjaro.

It is in this perspective that we are talking about Africa as a people. Because, all of that period of time we are talking about, you can go there now and see the artifacts in museums all over Europe and the United States of America. I’m not speaking to you chronologically, because I am using my recall; let us go back to the event that took place; and as I thought about this, something about medicine came to my mind, I remember going to the double Temple of Haroeris and Sobek; Haroeris represented by the Cobra Snake and Sobek represented by the Nile Crocodile. In that temple at the rear, you will find drawings of medical instruments going back to the time of Imhotep. That will bring us to about 285 B.C.E. to the construction of the Double Temple which was during Greek rule. Most of the medical instruments you see there are the exact dimension, the exact styles and shapes still used in medical operation theaters today. You could see all kinds of symbols relating to the use of incense; you could also find the beginnings of the aspect of the calendars (the dating process for the farmers) the same the Coptic farmers still use, the 13-monts calendar, twelve months of thirty days each, and one month of five days. The same one the Ethiopian government still uses, officially; that calendar still a means of telling time to date. When we go to the Temple of the Goddess Het-Heru (Hathor) at a place called Dendara, we see the beginnings of what is called the Zodiac. The French stole the original, and in carrying it to France, in hot pursuit by the Arabs of Egypt, they dropped it in the River Nile. Yet a Frenchman said he remembered everything, and he produced a whole new one within two weeks. So if you read Revelations, like this false Zodiac, it has nothing to do with St. John, but in fact Bishop Athanasius. This is the same thing. How could the French remember the stolen Egyptian Zodiac so well? It was rectangular, but what they remembered is circular. Thus it is the French who made the Zodiac they placed in the Temple of Goddess Het-Heru for tourist these days, and the tourist guides will tell you that is the French one. So!

You can see that even in those early times we were dealing with astronomy, and Europeans have not gone one inch further than those Africans along the Nile. What you have to remember, however, is that the Papyrus of Hunefer deals with the Africans who came down the Nile, who were already using this type of thing: and we must wonder since we don’t have the day-to-day, or enough artifacts to put them together to see the transition. Why is it that the Yorubas of West Africa have the same structure of the deity system as the Nile Valley? I don’t remember much because the Yorubas in their own folklore speak of having come from the Nile Valley; so you can stop wondering right there, since it is from their earliest teachings in their folklores.

When we go down the Nile and look at the engineering, and our engineering goes not only to the building of the pyramids by Imhotep, this multi-genius, but equally to the time of Senwosret II, with the division of the Nile water; equally to stop the rush of water. That would put us right back to 2,200 Before the Common “Christian” Era (B.C.E.).

The use of navigation and navigational instruments by using the sun and the stars as navigational tools—we have the best record of that going back even before Pharaoh Necho II, who saw the navigation of the entire continent and had a map of Africa in almost the common shape it is; and that dates to ca 600 B.C.E. Whereas Herodotus, who came to Egypt in 457 B.C.E., and Erastosthenes, who came there between 274–194 B.C.E., used maps which were rectangular in shape. They reflected the end of Africa being where the Sahara is, the southern end of the Sahara, meaning that they had no concept of Africa from about Ethiopia south to Monomotapa, now called the Republic of South Africa. It is important to note that England played a major role in most of the distortion that we are talking about.

Then we come again to another part that we are talking about, that is, agriculture, before we even come to writing. At the gathering state, when man observes the seed germinating, and out of that came the religious conflict, which other men are to later follow, comes out of one of the most secret symbols of the religiosity of Egypt and other parts of Africa. We are now talking about the dung beetle, and the observation of the African along the Nile with respect to the dung beetle, otherwise called the Scarab. The dung beetle hibernates, goes into the manure of a donkey, horse and the cow, only animals with grass manure. And that beetle remains in there for twenty-eight days; you know that particular beetle died in your mind. And when the beetle finally comes out, what better symbol will you have than the resurrection?

The beetle played the same part in the religion of the Egyptians that spread to other parts of Africa, and subsequently into Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and so on. Thus the beetle became the symbol of resurrection. Of course the religion itself had started then. Just imagine you’ve got to go back 1000 years and see your woman giving birth to a baby. I hope I did not frighten most of you fellows about childbirth; because if you had some experience of seeing a baby being born, you would be less quick to abandon your child. As you are standing there and this baby comes from the woman’s organ. You witness this, while the pelvic region is expanding about four or five inches in diameter for the head to pass through, and you are there. You can’t perceive that you have anything to do with this 100,000 or 5,000 years ago. Witnessing the birth of that baby sets you thinking. You immediately start to transcend your mind, and you also start to attribute this to something beyond. Thus you start to believe. You start to wonder’ why is it here? Where did it come from? And where is it going ? Because you are now experiencing birth! But your experience is coming from a woman. Thus you start to pray and the woman becomes your Goddess, your first deity. She becomes Goddess Nut, the goddess of the sky; and you become God Geb, the god of the earth. You suddenly see the sun in all of this and you realize that when the sun came the light came; and when the sun went, the light went; when the moon came you saw a moon in there and you don’t see any light because the light is not shining on it. So you see there is a God, at least there is the major attribute of God because you realize when that doesn’t happen, the crops and the vegetation don’t come.

You also realize that the sun and the moon make the river rise, and the Africans regarding these factors created the science of astronomy and astrology. Astrology, having nothing to do with your love life. Astronomy is the chart of the scientific data of the movement of the planets and the sun and so forth, to the movement of each other. Astrology is a physical relationship of astronomy, the water rising at the high tide and that is what the ancients spoke about and the division of the two disciplines.

It was the Greeks like Plato, Aristotle and others who came and learned. In those days the students would come and read for their education. There were no books to take home, there were no publishing houses like now. You had only one book and most of the subjects were taught orally. Certain instructions were given toe to toe, shoulder to shoulder, mouth to ear. I will go no further than that. Some of you here may know how that was done and under what conditions. The English adopted it and called it Freemasonry. Sir Albert Churchward’s book, Signs and Symbols of Primordial Man, is a corner stone of Freemasonry. Churchward was a big man in England. Besides being a physician, he was also one of those who made English Freemasonry what it is today. So in another adaptation, the British took twenty-two tablets from Egypt, brought them here and set up what they called “Freemasonry.” Of course, the Americans followed suit.

These Africans had moved along the entire continent. You see, we are treating the Egyptians today as if the Egyptians had a barrier that stopped them from going to other parts of Africa. So we say the Egyptians were of a special race, and they had nothing to do with the other Africans. Can you imagine the Thames River at this side stopping the people from the other side from contact with this side, especially when a man standing over there saw a woman here bathing naked; do you think that that river would stop him? Do you think that the Alps stopped a German from going to see an Italian woman? What makes you think that the little river or a little bit of sand would stop a man from seeing a woman naked over there in Africa? I’m using these common symbols so that you can appreciate what I mean. So it isn’t because when you go to Egypt you will notice that the ancient Egyptians are shown by the artist as the ancient Nubians or Ethiopians or anybody else, except when you are talking about the conquerors. In most of these museums they purposely bring you the statues of the Greeks, of the Romans, of the Persians, the Assyrians, and the Hyksos. They don’t bring you any of the Africans. So when they can’t help it, and they need to bring you one that you call a typical African like Pharaoh Mentuhotep III, it is important to Egypt that they have to show him. What they did was to make his nose flat, so you can’t tell the difference.

Thus once in a while, but when they couldn’t do it, what they did say, was: “Well, Negroes came into Egypt in the Eighteenth Dynasty.” Now it couldn’t be, because the Portuguese hadn’t created Negroes until the seventeenth century, C.E., but how come the Negroes created by the Portuguese have a place they called Negroland, which was in fact the Songhai Empire? In the map you could see where Negroland was, and so how do you get the “Negroes and Negroland” way back in the Eighteenth Dynasty? The Eighteenth Dynasty has such figures as Akhenaton, or Amenhotep IV, and his father, whom the Greeks called Amenhotep III; in the West you would call him Amenophis III. The civilization in Africa did not spread only from along the Nile, but it spread into your own writings, documents, and belief system right here in England.

I now go back to the Etruscans, who later became the Romans; the people of Pyrrhus, who later became the Greeks, because Pyrrhus was what later became Greece. But we don’t have these people until they came from the island of the Mediterranean or the Great Sea. At the time when they left, the Egyptians were the colonizers of other Africans in Egypt. Setting up the first educational system for the people of Pyrrhus, where the borders of Libus (now Libya) and Egypt meet; a little enclave which later became Africa. It is there that the educational system for the Greeks occurred, and from there the Africans moved the system to a place called the city of Elea. It is there that the Greeks would come. This is after they left the Greek peninsula, go to the Italian peninsula where they would meet others to come over to Libus, because they couldn’t come the other way as they were going illegally, sneaking out! Remember, the period of time of which we are speaking, there is no writing in Greece yet. Until Homer there is no writing in Greece. No record you could deal with. Whatever they learned, came from outside, came from Egypt, came from Babylonia. The Babylonian writings are part of this origin of Greece as well as the writings from at least 4100 B.C.E., the First Dynastic period, and this is not when writing started along the Nile. This is the First Dynasty, when Egypt reorganized herself from under two men. The war between the north, headed by King Scorpion, and the south headed by King Narmer, and that will bring us to about 4100 B.C.E. when Narmer started United or Dynastic Egypt.

So the pre-dynastic period was the period of the introduction of religion, of mathematics and science, engineering, law, medicine and so forth. The period of documentation also started then to some extent in the First Dynasty. The period of belief in “One God” really did not start with Akhnaten, that is, when somebody said there must be only “One God.” But the period of absorbing “One God” didn’t start then, because it is that period in 4100 B.C.E., when Narmer, after defeating Scorpion, the leader of the North, decided that the deity of the North, God Amen (which you say at the end of every prayer, you are still praying to the African God Amen), be put together with his own deity of the South, God Ra. But they didn’t notice that he made “One God’ out of the two, God Amen-Ra. He used them in that respect. But the people fell into civil war and there was division again. From that union, God Amen-Ra became God Ptah, and the Goddess of Justice became Maat. Justice, shown as a scale which is the same symbol now used in the United States for justice, except that there is no justice in the United States, because one scale is up, the other is down, and that is not justice; that is “just this”! Justice is when both scales are on the same level, and so the African in America who asks for justice is being foolish. The symbol says you will never get it; you’ll get “just this”!

Before these symbols came the laws on morality and human behavior, the Admonitions to Goddess Maat—Goddess of Justice and Law. There were forty-two Admonitions to Goddess Maat forming the foundation of justice. Then there are the teachings of Amen-em-eope one thousand years before Solomon stole them, some of which he plagiarized word for word, and others he paraphrased, which are now called the Proverbs of Solomon. And yet if we could have stopped there we would have done enough. But it wasn’t the last of it, so to speak. Because we came down with jurisprudence, the basis of law attached to the deity which we are teaching now as jurisprudence. And there is a thing in the African jurisprudence that a harborer should not get away from the penalty of the thief.

During the earliest time of the Kingdom of Ethiopia, King Uri, the first King of Ethiopia had spoken about, “justice isn’t based upon strength, but on morality of the condition of the event.” This now interprets as “the stronger should not mistreat the weaker”; and this is supposed to be something said by Plato, just like the nonsense we hear that “the Greeks had democracy.” The Greeks have never democracy. They never had one in the past and they don’t have it now. When they were supposed to have had democracy in Greece no more than five percent of the people had anything you could call democracy. When you look at that, you find it was from this background going back to the time of Amen-em-eope that theses fundamental laws came from, you could see why those laws spread from North Africa and into Numidia, which is today called Tunisia.

It is at Numidia then that Augustine’s family, continuing the practice of the Manichean religion, carried it into Rome later in the Christian Era. When he left his education in Khart-Haddas or Carthage, it is that same teaching from the Manicheans that Augustine carried into Rome. Ambrose, the greatest Christian scholar in all of Europe, became stunned. But when this twenty-nine-year-old boy arrived and spoke to Ambrose about his education in Carthage, Ambrose said, “Man, you’re heavy.” And Augustine took over. It was the same teachings that Guido the Monk, who went to Spain in the time of the Moors, had taught at the University of Salamanca which they had established. And it was the same Manichean concept that made Augustine write against the Stoics. Augustine wrote the fundamental principle that was to govern modern Christianity in its morality, when he presented them with a book called On Christian Doctrine. He had previously written the Holy City of God. If you want to check Augustine to see if he was an indigenous African read his Confessions. There he will tell you who he was.

When Islam came it was supposed to bring something new, but I ask “what did it bring new?” Because Islam was supposed to have started with an African woman by the name Hagar, according to Islamic literature. Hagar was from Egypt, and Abraham was from Asia—the City of Ur in Chaldea. At the time of Abraham’s birth a group of African people, called Elamites, were ruling. Before Abraham, the sacred river of India has been named after General Ganges, an African who came from Ethiopia. The River Ganges still carries the name of General Ganges. And I notice in India they haven’t given up the symbolic worship of the cow, which represents the Worship of Goddess Het-Heru, Hathor, the “Golden Calf” of the Jews. They also haven’t given up the obelisk that still stays there, which the Hindus copied. Again came an Englishman by the name of Sir Geoffrey Higgins, who published a two-volume work in 1836, and in Volume One in particular, he is speaking about all the deities of the past being “black,” but said: “I can’t accept that they could have come from even Egypt, they must have come from India.” He couldn’t accept it!

Out of that religion of the Nile Valley came the Religion of Ngail in Kenya from the same river base. And as the situation changed you had the Amazulu going for it, because the Zimbabwe river is still there. The people who were originally there were kicked off their land by the British, and equally by the Germans. When the German Dr. Carl Peters came there, the struggle between the Germans and the English for Tanganyika was going strong; both sides killed off the people around that area who spoke the local Rowzi language. So when you talk about Zimbabwe, don’t think about the nation alone. Zimbabwe also means a metropolis of buildings equal in design to the pyramids’ cone shape. When the sunlight coming in strikes the altar, the altar shines because of the sunlight. They had a mixture of gold and silver, the exact thing as what happens when you are down at the rock-hewn Temple of Rameses II, which is on November 22nd, when the sun comes in past the doors. It also happens in February. This shows the commonality of the African culture throughout Africa.

And lastly, just remember that when you see the Ashantis, the Yorubas, and all the other African people, they were not always where they are now. Arab and European slavery made the African migrate from one part of the African world to the other; that is why you can see in Akan culture as written by the African writer Dr. J. B. Danquah, the people with the same hair-cut, and the same beads and jewelry system as Queen Nefertari (the wife of Pharaoh Rameses II in the Nineteenth Dynasty), and Queen Nefertiti (the wife of Pharaoh Akhnaton in the Eighteen Dynasty). It is too much to speak about it, really.

If you had known this when you were much younger, you too over there, you would have wanted a nation; for you too would have realized that if you have a golden toilet in another man’s house (nation) you have got nothing. It is only when you have your own house (nation) that you can demand anything, because you don’t even need to demand anything, you do it. It is only when you have your own nation that you can decide the value and the judgment of beauty. If I was ruling England and you came to run for a beauty contest, you could be disqualified even before you came. You’re talking about racism; why not? This isn’t your country. You cannot run for a beauty contest in a white man’s country. You don’t see any Europeans winning any beauty contest in China, Japan or India; but the funny thing is that they come and win one in Nigeria. As a matter of fact Miss Trinidad was a white girl. Miss Barbados also a white girl, and Miss Jamaica was a white girl, all of them in a Black country. And this is what I’m saying. You can call it racist, but you know I’m telling the truth.

What I hope I have done is to make you understand the necessity for further research; but more than all, the necessity to talk to your child. When your physician tells you that you are pregnant that’s when you start teaching your child. Talk to the child at the time of birth. This is when his and/or her education starts, before he/she gets out of school, and before you and I die.


Source: http://www.nbufront.org/MastersMuseums/DocBen/SpreadOfAfricanCulture.html

 

On the Streets

Listen Siblings, I come in peace,

“As an African people, our very worst impediment, off or on the streets, is assuming the justice of a different people.  This is as if a wildebeest assumed the justice of a crocodile (or vice versa.)” — Onitaset Kumat

There is a key to Prosperous, Independent African Communities.  This key is untouched by most of us.  I go on the streets with key in hand to deliver a transformed fate to our knocked down people.  That key is uncovered throughout the African Blood Siblings Newsletter.  That key is Prosperous, Independent Communal Africans.  That key is created through African Blood Siblings Community Centers.  Inquire–Do not Learn for Learning’s Sake–Learn to Create.  Subscribe, share, love.

On the Streets
By Onitaset Kumat

For hours at a time, I stand on the streets; there I am not the respected, wise international Maroon, but the unnoticed slave of a slave, harshly scorned by a dying people.  Yet–leading the African Blood Siblings–I practice more than I preach.

I read.  On the streets, I read the faces, and behaviors, and being of the passersby and I determine there how I will inspire their creativity and community.  This reading is crucial to our uplift.

I write.  I write for the African Blood Siblings Newsletter on African Love, Knowledge and Wisdom.  But on the streets, I write down new approaches, so that success or failure, I again approach–better.  I do not reinvent the wheel.  I perfect my wheel.  Now, after months of field research, I am ninety-percent successful when before I wasn’t ten.  I now train others.

I rally.  All over the world, our people are creating African Blood Siblings Community Centers, but I am on the streets, explaining to people firsthand the necessity of creating a new consciousness for creativity.  I see some again; some absolutely jubilant.

And my work rewards.  For as long as I can remember, I have advocated for the liberators of African people; financing and promoting which liberators I could.  On the streets, I create those liberators.  With a clipboard in hand, I inspire young and old to share their email addresses.  They are then readers of liberation.

It’s no light feat to read my organization’s newsletter.  It presents our love, knowledge and wisdom in their purest forms.  But it’s a larger feat to write the newsletter and rally on the streets for it.  Yet I do this, acknowledging that few among us are free but we must all be liberated.  For nearly all of us are dependent for food, clothing, shelter and consciousness and independence must be created.  I work  hard to assure prosperity as a future despite the poverty of our present.

For consciousness amounts to justice.  As an African people, our very worst impediment, off or on the streets, is assuming the justice of a different people.  This is as if a wildebeest assumed the justice of a crocodile (or vice versa.)  All justice liberates.  European justice liberates Europeans.  Asian justice, Asians.  African justice, Africans.  Yet on others these justices enslave.

It is seen on the streets how we enslave ourselves.  Oftentimes, I am refused attention–scorned–but these same Brothers and Sisters kowtow without the race.  Sometimes I am circumvented lest I mention “free,” for we are wise with our money when it comes to our own; yet our local institutions attest how our resources empower others at our own expense.  A most notable error of ours is misunderstanding that not unlike the mirror, we reflect all that we sense.  We believe that as long as we know something is negative, we won’t be influenced.  Others rely on this lack of wisdom.  For most of us know we are negatively serviced, but we continue to patronize this unconvinced that we will be effected, though our habits, fashions, opinions and lifespans say otherwise.  It’s not subtlety–”ignorance”–that is shaping us, but “error” (as different as “wisdom” from “knowledge.”)

I observe and teach this on the streets–and the African Blood Siblings Newsletter.  But African Consciousness needs a physical institution to truly effect the broad masses of our people.  Therefore, we create African Blood Siblings Community Centers.  These centers offer a range of consciousness development spanning the four sciences of liberation: Philosophy, Sociology, Ecology, and Psychology.  The consciousness is known as restorative consciousness, an acknowledgement of the unspoken little known but fundamental ideology of all African people: Restorism–the ideology that inspired Maroons and the reclaiming of Ancient KMT (Egypt.)

On the streets, I gather a team of twelve in my age-grade (20-28); I insist you create the same for your own.  It’s the marriage between local membership and international leadership which will reconnect created Prosperous, Independent African Communities at home and abroad, allowing for the first time, in a very long time, a globally liberated African people–with plentiful fresh fruits and vegetables, garments patterned for the Cosmos and homes affording lively, spiritual, transnationally interconnected, proud beautiful communities.  It is for you to read, to write, to rally the African Blood Siblings–on the streets.  And do not forget to subscribe to the African Blood Siblings Newsletter.

See you at a Center or–on the streets.

Maat: The Egyptian Code of Cardinal Virtues as translated by Theophile Obenga

Listen Siblings, I come in peace,

“Two tendencies govern human choice and effort, the search after quantity and the search after quality. They classify mankind. Some follow Maat, others seek the way of animal instinct.” — KMT Proverb

In the world of sales, I labour to provide for our people quality. Our people scorn quality. Our people are made to think that quantity, the way of animal instinct, is better than quality, the way of Maat. We do not eat quality food, we do not wear quality clothes, we do not live in quality homes, we do not live quality lives because we do not share quality knowledge. A quality Philosopher like myself is worth no more to most of us than the quantity rabblerousers we are dealt. Sooner do we promote Jay-Z or Lil Wayne than the promulgator of Truth and Law/Justice Onitaset Kumat. How often have you promoted Onitaset Kumat? How often have you provided for this servant of your interests?

The following excerpts are from Chapter 125 of “The Book of the Dead” (also called “The Book of Coming Forth by Day”) as written during the New Kingdom on the Papyrus of Nu; as translated by Theophile Obenga. Obenga doesn’t explain who the Two Maat Goddesses are but context suggests “Truth and Justice” [Dr. Ben corrects us by writing "Truth an Law" which has intelligent implications as we see here.] I’ll footnote the excerpts to share additional information.

The scene portrayed is within the Hall of “Truth and Justice” where the speaker requests eternal life for perfect innocence: blamelessness. Our ancestors were assured eternal life by living blamelessly; always just. I am blameless and I teach blamelessness. Are you blameless? Do you teach blamelessness? Have you showed your graciousness to the ABS?

African Blood Siblings Community Centers, like this Papyrus of Nu, are temples of Blamelessness. Read the following excerpts, then step up for our people. I challenge you to lead a quality life. Take the challenge.  Write the ABS for information on helping to build an African Blood Siblings Community Center.  Subscribe, share, love.

Maat: The Egyptian Code of Cardinal Virtues
As translated by Theophile Obenga

Words spoken by N.:
Hail to you, great god, lord of the two Maat goddesses,[1]
I have come to you, my lord, having been brought to see your beauty.
I know you, and I know your name;
I know the names of these forty-two deities[2]
who are with you in this hall of the two Maat goddesses,
who live by monitoring sins
and drink of sinners’ blood
on the judgment day of virtues before the Beautiful One.
Look, “He of the two daughters, the two beloved sisters,
lord of the two Maat goddesses” — that is your name.
See, I have come to you, and brought you what is just;[3]
For your sake I have cast off evil.
I have done no one evil;
I have not mistreated people.
I have committed no crimes in the Place of Truth.
I have not known what is forbidden; I have done no evil.
I have not begun any day by collecting bribes from workers under my charge;
my name has not been reported to a foreman of servants.
I have deprived no craftsman of his property;
I have not done what is abominable to the gods;
I have caused no weeping; I have not killed,
I have given no order to kill, I have caused no one pain.
I have not taken a cut from food offerings in the temples;
I have not blasphemed against the primordial deities;
I have not stolen the cake offerings of the blessed;
I have not copulated with a man; I have not fornicated.[4]
I have not given half-measure with the bushel
nor shortened the measuring rod when surveying land;
I have not cheated in laying out plots of land;
I have biased no scales
nor skewed the needle on the balance.

I have not taken milk from the mouth of babe;
nor deprived nursling livestock of their fodder.
I have trapped no birds in the reed marshes of the gods,
nor caught fish in their ponds.
I have not retained water when it was time for it to flow,
nor have I dammed up running water.
I have not quenched fire burning bright;
I have not failed to offer meat on sacrificial days.
I have not stolen livestock earmarked for the holy feast.
I have not obstructed a god coming out in procession.
I am pure, I am pure, I am pure, I am pure.[5]
My purity is that of the great phoenix of Heracleopolis,
For I am the very nose of the Lord of Breaths
who gives life to all people on this day of the Filling of the Eye in Heliopolis,
the last day of the second month of winter, in the presence of the lord of this land,
and I am one who has seen the Filling of the Eye in Heliopolis.
No evil shall befall me in this land, in this hall of the two Maat sisters,
Because I know the names of the deities present there.
Hail to you, you gods, present in the hall of the two Maat sisters:
I know you; I know your names.
I shall not fall under your blows;
You will not condemn me before this god who leads you;
You shall not arraign me before him.
You will justify me before the lord of the universe,
because I have practiced justice in Egypt.
I have not blasphemed against god,
and by the grace of the reigning king, I have not been reported to the assessors.
Hail to you who are in this hall of the two Maat sisters,
innocent of lies by their nature,
you who live on justice and feast on truth
before Horus in his disk
Save me from Baba, consumer of the guts of the great,
on this day of the great accounting of sins.
Here I am; I come to you
sinless, blameless, innocent of meanness,
accused by none, having made none suffer.
I live on justice, I feast on truth.
My deeds have made men talk and deities rejoice.
I have pleased the god with what he loves.
I have given bread to the hungry, water to the thirsty,
clothes to the naked, a boat to the boatless.
I have served up divine offerings for the gods,
and given funeral offerings for the blessed.
Save me, therefore, protect me. Do not condemn me before [the great god]!
For I am one whose mouth is clean, whose hands are clean;
One who is invited to come in peace
by those who see him.

Footnotes:

[1] The Lord of Two Maat Goddesses is Osiris, ruler of the Kingdom of the blessed. The Two Maat Goddesses appear to be Truth and Law (Dr. Ben) [or Justice (Dr. Obenga).]
[2] The forty-two deities represent the forty-two nomes (city-states) of KMT (Egypt.)
[3] “Just,” like “Evil,” and other moral statements are mostly objective. See “The Law of Morality” written by Onitaset Kumat for proof.
[4] This is an ancient admonition against Homosexuality. Dr. Umar A Johnson has an excellent contemporary admonition. See here.
[5] The series on race does an excellent job in discussing “Corruption” which is the antithesis of “Purity.” It’s a very worthwhile reading. See here.